This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Starting page: to discuss date
The semi-comprehensive synopsis, ( 9 paragraphs, about 700 words ), starts the article by saying age is 4500-4000 BC.
A quote from the article(No. 34):
Article also includes an In situ grave pic, and a pic of an organized, "laid-out" group of artefacts (+shell bead necklace?).MMcAnnis,YumaAZ Mmcannis 15:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
"The local variant of the KGKIV:" I don't think one reader in five hundred has any idea of what this signifies; was such impressive mystification intended? I can guess this is a culture stratum, fourth in someone's series. Perhaps one of those Ks stands for Kalkolithic or Kulture... -- Wetman ( talk) 01:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
"The gold artifacts from the Varna Chalcolithic necropolis are assumed to be the “oldest gold of mankind” according to their total volume and quantity. " Does not make sense to me. It implies that the volume and quantity prove it is the oldest.
IceDragon64 ( talk) 22:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Still a problem. 87.247.25.178 ( talk) 08:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
I could not appopriately edit the See also section, which has at least 1 corrupted link, so I inserted the replacement, but it fell above the numbered list. Help, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anyaka ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Varna Necropolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand the following sentance: "The gold artifacts from the Varna Chalcolithic necropolis are assumed to be the "oldest gold of mankind" according to their total volume and quantity" Surely the volume and quantity have nothing to do with whether it is the oldest? IceDragon64 ( talk) 01:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
IceDragon64 ( talk) 01:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Starting page: to discuss date
The semi-comprehensive synopsis, ( 9 paragraphs, about 700 words ), starts the article by saying age is 4500-4000 BC.
A quote from the article(No. 34):
Article also includes an In situ grave pic, and a pic of an organized, "laid-out" group of artefacts (+shell bead necklace?).MMcAnnis,YumaAZ Mmcannis 15:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
"The local variant of the KGKIV:" I don't think one reader in five hundred has any idea of what this signifies; was such impressive mystification intended? I can guess this is a culture stratum, fourth in someone's series. Perhaps one of those Ks stands for Kalkolithic or Kulture... -- Wetman ( talk) 01:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
"The gold artifacts from the Varna Chalcolithic necropolis are assumed to be the “oldest gold of mankind” according to their total volume and quantity. " Does not make sense to me. It implies that the volume and quantity prove it is the oldest.
IceDragon64 ( talk) 22:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Still a problem. 87.247.25.178 ( talk) 08:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
I could not appopriately edit the See also section, which has at least 1 corrupted link, so I inserted the replacement, but it fell above the numbered list. Help, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anyaka ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Varna Necropolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand the following sentance: "The gold artifacts from the Varna Chalcolithic necropolis are assumed to be the "oldest gold of mankind" according to their total volume and quantity" Surely the volume and quantity have nothing to do with whether it is the oldest? IceDragon64 ( talk) 01:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
IceDragon64 ( talk) 01:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)