This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
To be upfront, this article isn't even close to what to expect from a C-Class article, let alone GA. A full review:
The entire article reads like a list, with nearly every paragraph being only one to two sentences. None of the article naturally flows into the next part, and its generally just not pleasant to read or look at.
If this makes any sense, the prose that is there feels like promotional material that just talks about a teams projects and its awards. There's not even any information on how or when the team was formed!
The lead section is a complete violation of
MOS:LEAD. It is not an accurate summary of the article, but rather ends up creating what is basically a duplicate article. It is nearly the exact same text as the main prose, down to its reading like a list nature.
The team being based in Dublin is never verified in the article, and is unsourced in the prose.
"Following its release, Virginia was nominated for several awards, with the writers of the game receiving the award for Best Writing in a Video Game at the 2017 Writers' Guild Awards and Virginia's composer, Lyndon Holland, receiving the BAFTA for Music at the British Academy Games Awards in 2017." is unsourced.
Several sources here don't have established reliability at
WP:RSP or
WP:VG/S. What are Nouse and Anait Games? And 2020 Videogamer.com articles don't have established reliability. This article is nowhere even close to meeting the good article criteria, and I encourage the editor to take a look at existing GAs for game development companies
Based on all of the issues listed above, I am failing this article as present, and also demoting it down to a Start-class article per
WP:VG/A. I encourage the nominator to take a look at the development studios that are already good articles, with a list of these being at
WP:VG/GC. But this article is a long way from meeting that criteria. λNegativeMP1 04:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
To be upfront, this article isn't even close to what to expect from a C-Class article, let alone GA. A full review:
The entire article reads like a list, with nearly every paragraph being only one to two sentences. None of the article naturally flows into the next part, and its generally just not pleasant to read or look at.
If this makes any sense, the prose that is there feels like promotional material that just talks about a teams projects and its awards. There's not even any information on how or when the team was formed!
The lead section is a complete violation of
MOS:LEAD. It is not an accurate summary of the article, but rather ends up creating what is basically a duplicate article. It is nearly the exact same text as the main prose, down to its reading like a list nature.
The team being based in Dublin is never verified in the article, and is unsourced in the prose.
"Following its release, Virginia was nominated for several awards, with the writers of the game receiving the award for Best Writing in a Video Game at the 2017 Writers' Guild Awards and Virginia's composer, Lyndon Holland, receiving the BAFTA for Music at the British Academy Games Awards in 2017." is unsourced.
Several sources here don't have established reliability at
WP:RSP or
WP:VG/S. What are Nouse and Anait Games? And 2020 Videogamer.com articles don't have established reliability. This article is nowhere even close to meeting the good article criteria, and I encourage the editor to take a look at existing GAs for game development companies
Based on all of the issues listed above, I am failing this article as present, and also demoting it down to a Start-class article per
WP:VG/A. I encourage the nominator to take a look at the development studios that are already good articles, with a list of these being at
WP:VG/GC. But this article is a long way from meeting that criteria. λNegativeMP1 04:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.