GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs)
20:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Nominator:
Npatel92
I see that you are submitting this article as a GA nomination as part of a school project. I also see that the only changes you have made to the article so far have been a few changes to the headings. I'm afraid this article suffers from a number of shortcomings, and I can't promote it to GA status at this time. I can, however, give you some guidance as to the best ways to improve this article, so that it can hopefully become a GA at some point in the future.
This article does not merit GA status at this time. To fulfill our GA criteria, you will need to move all information from the lead into the article body, and then rewrite the lead from scratch. You would need to check all sources used to make sure the information in the article is fully supported without plagiarism. And you would need to make sure all important information about the species is provided in the article. (For an example of an excellent article on a similar species, see Chrysiridia rhipheus.) If all this is done, feel free to renominate the article for GA status. – Quadell ( talk) 21:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs)
20:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Nominator:
Npatel92
I see that you are submitting this article as a GA nomination as part of a school project. I also see that the only changes you have made to the article so far have been a few changes to the headings. I'm afraid this article suffers from a number of shortcomings, and I can't promote it to GA status at this time. I can, however, give you some guidance as to the best ways to improve this article, so that it can hopefully become a GA at some point in the future.
This article does not merit GA status at this time. To fulfill our GA criteria, you will need to move all information from the lead into the article body, and then rewrite the lead from scratch. You would need to check all sources used to make sure the information in the article is fully supported without plagiarism. And you would need to make sure all important information about the species is provided in the article. (For an example of an excellent article on a similar species, see Chrysiridia rhipheus.) If all this is done, feel free to renominate the article for GA status. – Quadell ( talk) 21:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)