Varagavank has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
December 1, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Varagavank monastery was the site of Armenian resistance to Turkish government forces during the
Armenian Genocide? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this article be merged with Monastery of Yedi Kilisa? Sardur ( talk) 10:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Should not be merged, the historic and original Armenian name of this monastery is Varagavank.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld ( talk · contribs) 17:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Will review within a couple of days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Yerevantsi: Reviewing now, sorry for the delay.
Place all book sources in bibliography and use footnotes for pages. You can draw the sources up again here.
I was expecting to pass this pretty soon, but I think it's still a little rough around the edges and the sourcing needs to be made consistent. In some places the dates recited are a bit repetitive and almost in note form. Would benefit from a further copy edit and ideally some expansion of architecture before I'm ready to pass.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Yerevantsi: Are you going to respond here? I'll leave this for a few more days but I'm afraid I'll have to fail it if it isn't improved by then.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Yerevantsi: I gather there's nothing more available documenting its architecture? The prose seems to have much improved now anyway. Can you let me know if you can find anything before we proceed?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to withdraw this nomination, because the article is not ready to be classified as a good article. -- Երևանցի talk 00:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
We're just about OK I think Yerevantsi since the copyediting of it by Eric and Casliber, but when I ask a question about things like architecture I'd really appreciate an adequate response from you as well as some sort of appreciation that I've spent the time reviewing it. I'll take for granted that nothing more can be found about it architecturally. This looks OK for GA now I believe, thanks for bearing with me on this, you've already waited long enough.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
"The monastery was composed of six churches, gavit, narthex, (nakhasrah), and other structures." Means WHAT? "Gavit" seems to mean narthex, so the 2 are actually 1, then comma-parantheses makes no sense, and nobody knows what "nakhasrah" means. The source (a Soviet encyclopaedia) is not available online. Arminden ( talk) 08:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Varagavank has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
December 1, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Varagavank monastery was the site of Armenian resistance to Turkish government forces during the
Armenian Genocide? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this article be merged with Monastery of Yedi Kilisa? Sardur ( talk) 10:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Should not be merged, the historic and original Armenian name of this monastery is Varagavank.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld ( talk · contribs) 17:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Will review within a couple of days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Yerevantsi: Reviewing now, sorry for the delay.
Place all book sources in bibliography and use footnotes for pages. You can draw the sources up again here.
I was expecting to pass this pretty soon, but I think it's still a little rough around the edges and the sourcing needs to be made consistent. In some places the dates recited are a bit repetitive and almost in note form. Would benefit from a further copy edit and ideally some expansion of architecture before I'm ready to pass.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Yerevantsi: Are you going to respond here? I'll leave this for a few more days but I'm afraid I'll have to fail it if it isn't improved by then.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Yerevantsi: I gather there's nothing more available documenting its architecture? The prose seems to have much improved now anyway. Can you let me know if you can find anything before we proceed?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to withdraw this nomination, because the article is not ready to be classified as a good article. -- Երևանցի talk 00:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
We're just about OK I think Yerevantsi since the copyediting of it by Eric and Casliber, but when I ask a question about things like architecture I'd really appreciate an adequate response from you as well as some sort of appreciation that I've spent the time reviewing it. I'll take for granted that nothing more can be found about it architecturally. This looks OK for GA now I believe, thanks for bearing with me on this, you've already waited long enough.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
"The monastery was composed of six churches, gavit, narthex, (nakhasrah), and other structures." Means WHAT? "Gavit" seems to mean narthex, so the 2 are actually 1, then comma-parantheses makes no sense, and nobody knows what "nakhasrah" means. The source (a Soviet encyclopaedia) is not available online. Arminden ( talk) 08:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)