This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Robotics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Vandy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vanderbilt University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VandyWikipedia:WikiProject VandyTemplate:WikiProject VandyVandy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Disability Vanderbilt exoskeleton is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

A fact from Vanderbilt exoskeleton appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 December 2012 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that American paraplegics are now learning to walk again by wearing a robotic exoskeleton? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanderbilt exoskeleton.

Noticed at WP:ERRORS [1] and WP:ANI: [2] SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 17:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Please review WP:MEDRS; we cannot cite medical facts to blogs and press releases. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 17:12, 12 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Resolved now – independent sources and professional medical refs for paraplegia statistics have been added. — Michaelmas1957 ( talk) 17:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC) reply

The Medgadget article - currently this article's first referenced source - says the Vanderbilt device is lighter and smaller than the competition, but our article says it is lighter than most contemporary powered exoskeletons. Which is true? -- Anthonyhcole ( talk) 13:59, 13 December 2012 (UTC) reply

If our article is correct, it throws some doubt upon the reliability of that Medgadget article. -- Anthonyhcole ( talk) 05:24, 16 December 2012 (UTC) reply

The "most" label here I think refers to other commercial or semi-commercial therapeutic exoskeletons (like the ReWalk or HAL). I'll clarify that in the article. — Michaelmas1957 ( talk) 05:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC) reply

This article reads like an advertisement for the Vanderbelt exoskeleton. Mylittlezach ( talk) 12:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC) reply