This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver / Electoral districts Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia. This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

In reversing a needless change - unless Vancouver-Kensington should now be in the "defunct" group - I noticed blanks where the Vancouver Island section headings are. No doubt some earnest editor thought "those aren't in Vancouver!" and deleted them. No, but they're named Vancouver, from and in the days when that word didn't mean Burrard Inlet, but ONLY meant Vancouver Island; long story; they have a historical existence and they were listed on this page because of the confusion,as those artifcles exists and should be indexed with others of like name, no? I guess I have to dig them out again; I'll try and cite all these defunct ones especially because it seems like people who don't know electoral history well will alwaysbe making edits ot the page, thinking they're right.... Skookum1 ( talk) 04:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC) reply