 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Vaginal weightlifting page were merged into Kegel exercises. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Most of this article seems to come from "Shiva Rose", but even the article only calls her a "claimed expert in jade eggs". Why the undue weight on what she says? Equinox ◑ 15:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Badly sourced, among other things. I'm not sure exactly what the Wikipedia policy is for alternative medicine and for self-promotion, but this seems sketchy. Maybe we should at least eliminate the huge block quote? Test35965 ( talk) 04:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Among the other issues with this page, isn't the Goop controversy given undue weight here? Would there be objections to trimming some of that back? The Goop thing probably should've never been so fleshed out in this article in the first place, as it's more like a current event or news piece. Alternatively, the Goop controversy could be its own section so as to justify all of the information written now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJ0053 ( talk • contribs) 03:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| The contents of the Vaginal weightlifting page were merged into Kegel exercises. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Most of this article seems to come from "Shiva Rose", but even the article only calls her a "claimed expert in jade eggs". Why the undue weight on what she says? Equinox ◑ 15:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Badly sourced, among other things. I'm not sure exactly what the Wikipedia policy is for alternative medicine and for self-promotion, but this seems sketchy. Maybe we should at least eliminate the huge block quote? Test35965 ( talk) 04:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Among the other issues with this page, isn't the Goop controversy given undue weight here? Would there be objections to trimming some of that back? The Goop thing probably should've never been so fleshed out in this article in the first place, as it's more like a current event or news piece. Alternatively, the Goop controversy could be its own section so as to justify all of the information written now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJ0053 ( talk • contribs) 03:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)