This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Vadda Ghalughara article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| A member of the
Guild of Copy Editors,
PaintedCarpet, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 30 May 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{
copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our
project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Article should be reviewed by an expert on the subject and checked for neutrality first. Sections may need rewriting, which is beyond the scope of a simple copy edit. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 June 2020 and 2 August 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jasleenbghuman.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Generally, the factual outline seems reasonable. However, the POV seems to be clearly biased in favor of a particular political/sectarian reading of history. This bias is reinforced in the sources used, all of which upon at least cursory examination are highly partial to one particular viewpoint. IronSheep ( talk) 04:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
ITS MISSING A WHOLE POINT ON HOW DID THE SIKHS THEN TAKE BACK HARI MANDIR SAHIB???? THERES NO ACCOUNT OF IT ON THE PAGE, DOESNT MAKE SENSE, THIS ARTICLE NEEDS CLEANING UP AND PUT IN CHRONILOGICAL ORDER OF EVENTS. VERY CONFUSING!!!!! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.6.109.124 (
talk)
15:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
The flow of this article seems abrupt; a brief section on the later events and activities of the Sikhs after the holocaust would be helpful. -- Roadahead ★ 22:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Holocaust (a proper noun reference) is a historical definition in particular to the events of
Nazi Germany. This article msut renamed Ghallugarha for clarity. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
113.11.48.195 (
talk)
13:30, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
What is the preferred transliteration scheme for Punjabi ? In particular, should ਘੱਲੂਘਾਰਾ be transliterated into English as:
Ditto, for the article Chhotaa Ghallooghaaraa. Abecedare ( talk) 20:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Sikh holocaust of 1762 → Sikh genocide of 1762 – The word "holocaust" is too opinionated. There's no reason to use the more straight forward word "genocide". Durranina ( talk) 17:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC) -> Support. Holocaust should be reserved for the WWII persecution. We're not calling all genocides 'holocaust'. Also, 30 thousand people? Not sure if this is genocide or 'normal' invasion practices. 77.167.250.126 ( talk) 20:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Sikh holocaust of 1762. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Sikh holocaust of 1762 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Tayi Arajakate
Talk
11:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Vadda Ghalughara article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| A member of the
Guild of Copy Editors,
PaintedCarpet, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 30 May 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{
copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our
project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Article should be reviewed by an expert on the subject and checked for neutrality first. Sections may need rewriting, which is beyond the scope of a simple copy edit. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 June 2020 and 2 August 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jasleenbghuman.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Generally, the factual outline seems reasonable. However, the POV seems to be clearly biased in favor of a particular political/sectarian reading of history. This bias is reinforced in the sources used, all of which upon at least cursory examination are highly partial to one particular viewpoint. IronSheep ( talk) 04:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
ITS MISSING A WHOLE POINT ON HOW DID THE SIKHS THEN TAKE BACK HARI MANDIR SAHIB???? THERES NO ACCOUNT OF IT ON THE PAGE, DOESNT MAKE SENSE, THIS ARTICLE NEEDS CLEANING UP AND PUT IN CHRONILOGICAL ORDER OF EVENTS. VERY CONFUSING!!!!! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.6.109.124 (
talk)
15:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
The flow of this article seems abrupt; a brief section on the later events and activities of the Sikhs after the holocaust would be helpful. -- Roadahead ★ 22:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Holocaust (a proper noun reference) is a historical definition in particular to the events of
Nazi Germany. This article msut renamed Ghallugarha for clarity. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
113.11.48.195 (
talk)
13:30, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
What is the preferred transliteration scheme for Punjabi ? In particular, should ਘੱਲੂਘਾਰਾ be transliterated into English as:
Ditto, for the article Chhotaa Ghallooghaaraa. Abecedare ( talk) 20:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Sikh holocaust of 1762 → Sikh genocide of 1762 – The word "holocaust" is too opinionated. There's no reason to use the more straight forward word "genocide". Durranina ( talk) 17:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC) -> Support. Holocaust should be reserved for the WWII persecution. We're not calling all genocides 'holocaust'. Also, 30 thousand people? Not sure if this is genocide or 'normal' invasion practices. 77.167.250.126 ( talk) 20:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Sikh holocaust of 1762. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Sikh holocaust of 1762 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Tayi Arajakate
Talk
11:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)