![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
VX Sgr may even be larger than WOH G64, possibly display a size of between 1,350-1,940 solar radii, that is to say about 1645 solar radii (2,290,965,180 km). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.192.212.179 ( talk) 17:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Following comment moved here from my talk page: Lithopsian ( talk) 19:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, this is a obsolete source, 35 years ago..other time in astronomy ;-)-- Kirk39 ( talk) 18:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
The parralax should be 0.64 mill-arcsec (mas), not 0.64", otherwise it would only be 5.8 ly away 2001:388:6080:6118:31F4:1179:74C1:5125 ( talk) 05:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
This paper
[1] gives the star a higher luminosity of 275,000+114,000
−52,000 L☉. Should we add it?
2A01:E0A:47A:F100:6102:3E30:39BD:CC4F (
talk)
20:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
References
This very recent reference
[1] states VX Sgr is most likely to be an extreme super-AGB star or even a TZO star and the most luminous AGB star at Mbol = –8.6 or 217,000+160,000
−92,000. Can we mention it in the article?
P.S. should we remove the 853 R☉ value in the starbox. It's pretty old comparing to the 1,120-1,550 estimate from Xu et al. 2018 and not reliable enough. 2A01:E0A:47A:F100:6525:88A1:3F3D:25EB ( talk) 17:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
References
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
VX Sgr may even be larger than WOH G64, possibly display a size of between 1,350-1,940 solar radii, that is to say about 1645 solar radii (2,290,965,180 km). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.192.212.179 ( talk) 17:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Following comment moved here from my talk page: Lithopsian ( talk) 19:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, this is a obsolete source, 35 years ago..other time in astronomy ;-)-- Kirk39 ( talk) 18:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
The parralax should be 0.64 mill-arcsec (mas), not 0.64", otherwise it would only be 5.8 ly away 2001:388:6080:6118:31F4:1179:74C1:5125 ( talk) 05:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
This paper
[1] gives the star a higher luminosity of 275,000+114,000
−52,000 L☉. Should we add it?
2A01:E0A:47A:F100:6102:3E30:39BD:CC4F (
talk)
20:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
References
This very recent reference
[1] states VX Sgr is most likely to be an extreme super-AGB star or even a TZO star and the most luminous AGB star at Mbol = –8.6 or 217,000+160,000
−92,000. Can we mention it in the article?
P.S. should we remove the 853 R☉ value in the starbox. It's pretty old comparing to the 1,120-1,550 estimate from Xu et al. 2018 and not reliable enough. 2A01:E0A:47A:F100:6525:88A1:3F3D:25EB ( talk) 17:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
References
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)