VVS Laxman was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 25, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
List of international cricket centuries by V. V. S. Laxman was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 February 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into VVS Laxman. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
DumZiBoT ( talk) 03:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
He is termed as very special because he plays shorts very differently out of the way.He is the first Hyderabad player to play 100 above tests. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajashekahr ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Can anyone explain the spelling–pronunciation discrepancy ("Latchman")? Rothorpe ( talk) 13:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
A sensible, sourced and NPOV account of the vaseline controversy should be added to this article. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ssriram mt ( talk · contribs) 00:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC) I will take up the review of the article.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | There are a few spelling mistakes. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead and sections have peacock terms (superb timing, such a fine stroke player). The sentence formation and contents have lot of repetition (like Person life, Early career sections) | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | There are quite some references that are bare urls lacking the basic parameters like publisher, first, last names and accessdate. Some paras are totally without any reference. The ref structure is highly malformed. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Goes with 2a above. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | The stats needs to be realigned. Data for Test cricket 50/100s against each nation is missing. Also what is the 135 that hangs out? The fielding records can be included for Tests as well. Quotes can be written inside user boxes rather than as a separate section. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Image alt needs to be added and a detailed description. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Since there are lot of comments that would need time to fix, i am failing it for now. Please fix the same and subject it to GAN later. All the best. |
He is not the grandson of any former President. This information has been removed.-- Abhinav619 ( talk) 09:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
As per the manual of style, shouldn't the initials in the title be written with periods and spaces? Dev Darshan T. K. ( talk) 05:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
VVS Laxman was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 25, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
List of international cricket centuries by V. V. S. Laxman was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 February 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into VVS Laxman. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
DumZiBoT ( talk) 03:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
He is termed as very special because he plays shorts very differently out of the way.He is the first Hyderabad player to play 100 above tests. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajashekahr ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Can anyone explain the spelling–pronunciation discrepancy ("Latchman")? Rothorpe ( talk) 13:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
A sensible, sourced and NPOV account of the vaseline controversy should be added to this article. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ssriram mt ( talk · contribs) 00:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC) I will take up the review of the article.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | There are a few spelling mistakes. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead and sections have peacock terms (superb timing, such a fine stroke player). The sentence formation and contents have lot of repetition (like Person life, Early career sections) | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | There are quite some references that are bare urls lacking the basic parameters like publisher, first, last names and accessdate. Some paras are totally without any reference. The ref structure is highly malformed. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Goes with 2a above. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | The stats needs to be realigned. Data for Test cricket 50/100s against each nation is missing. Also what is the 135 that hangs out? The fielding records can be included for Tests as well. Quotes can be written inside user boxes rather than as a separate section. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Image alt needs to be added and a detailed description. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Since there are lot of comments that would need time to fix, i am failing it for now. Please fix the same and subject it to GAN later. All the best. |
He is not the grandson of any former President. This information has been removed.-- Abhinav619 ( talk) 09:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
As per the manual of style, shouldn't the initials in the title be written with periods and spaces? Dev Darshan T. K. ( talk) 05:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)