![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The VVER-1000 does have a regular style western contaiment. Will u please add this to ur article. Thanks --unsigned comment by 68.194.98.25 at 03:29, 19 January 2006
Loviisa 1 and 2 in Finland are VVERs with containment buildings added. --unsigned comment by 128.214.182.110 (talk) at 11:11, 3 February 2006
This transcription from Russian to English is a great invention :)
-- peyerk 11:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
This page has a lack of citation. It needs to have it. BlackSlivers 02:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I have never heard the abbreviation "WWER" used in English, only "VVER." Is this a term used in Commonwealth countries, because I only recall seeing this in German or Polish texts. -- Adamrush ( talk) 14:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Construction 1958
Start operation dec-1964 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.24.80.5 ( talk) 13:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
This article repeats the myth that RBMKs have no containment, which has been spread to distinguish "dangerous" Soviet designs from modern "safe" ones. Yet Chernobyl 1 had a 2250-tonne reactor lid, which was clearly not intended to keep out the rain and the birds. The point is not that RBMKs have no containment - rather that that containment has been proven to be inadequate. Theeurocrat ( talk) 14:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
RuPedia artice on VVER suggests, that there are 3 sub-models of VVER-440, initial VVER-440-230, later safer VVER-440-213, and seismo-adapted VVER-440-270. Latter is inherited from 230 submodel, but still is a different 'SKU'. And those submodels are the reactors of Metsamor/Armenia. 79.111.193.57 ( talk) 09:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
"To ensure safety all primary components are redundant." - But according to the picture it seems that there is only one Pressurizer? -- BjKa ( talk) 10:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I took out the following section:
It's a nice description, but not particular to the VVER-1200. It belongs in a generic article about the emergency cooling of nuclear power stations. -- BjKa ( talk) 12:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
"[...] had to close with this two respectively four of their units." What does this mean in English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.167.255 ( talk) 19:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Because of this, Bohunice Nuclear Power Plant had to close two reactors and Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant had to close four.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The VVER-1000 does have a regular style western contaiment. Will u please add this to ur article. Thanks --unsigned comment by 68.194.98.25 at 03:29, 19 January 2006
Loviisa 1 and 2 in Finland are VVERs with containment buildings added. --unsigned comment by 128.214.182.110 (talk) at 11:11, 3 February 2006
This transcription from Russian to English is a great invention :)
-- peyerk 11:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
This page has a lack of citation. It needs to have it. BlackSlivers 02:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I have never heard the abbreviation "WWER" used in English, only "VVER." Is this a term used in Commonwealth countries, because I only recall seeing this in German or Polish texts. -- Adamrush ( talk) 14:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Construction 1958
Start operation dec-1964 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.24.80.5 ( talk) 13:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
This article repeats the myth that RBMKs have no containment, which has been spread to distinguish "dangerous" Soviet designs from modern "safe" ones. Yet Chernobyl 1 had a 2250-tonne reactor lid, which was clearly not intended to keep out the rain and the birds. The point is not that RBMKs have no containment - rather that that containment has been proven to be inadequate. Theeurocrat ( talk) 14:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
RuPedia artice on VVER suggests, that there are 3 sub-models of VVER-440, initial VVER-440-230, later safer VVER-440-213, and seismo-adapted VVER-440-270. Latter is inherited from 230 submodel, but still is a different 'SKU'. And those submodels are the reactors of Metsamor/Armenia. 79.111.193.57 ( talk) 09:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
"To ensure safety all primary components are redundant." - But according to the picture it seems that there is only one Pressurizer? -- BjKa ( talk) 10:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I took out the following section:
It's a nice description, but not particular to the VVER-1200. It belongs in a generic article about the emergency cooling of nuclear power stations. -- BjKa ( talk) 12:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
"[...] had to close with this two respectively four of their units." What does this mean in English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.167.255 ( talk) 19:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Because of this, Bohunice Nuclear Power Plant had to close two reactors and Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant had to close four.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)