This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
VP-HL-1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mztourist Please provide very..... very specific instruction/example on what you believe are acceptable guidelines for the reference sources I followed up with that you have undone. We need to avoid further cryptic reasons that I can't act on. I provided the following:
This article references additional operational events cited from the following US Navy Declassified public domain reports regarding the VP-HL-1/VPB-116 through authority of E. O. 13526 by: NDC, NARA Date 12/31/2012. The reports are available through Fold 3 by Ancestry.com as follows: 2. Squadron History – Patrol Bombing Squadron VPB-116 1943-1945 3. Aircraft Action Reports - VPB-116 1943-1945 4. War Diaries - VPB-116 1943-1945
What more is specifically needed?
Specific web links? Here are some such as...
https://www.fold3.com/document/295840383/ https://www.fold3.com/document/287147638/ https://www.fold3.com/document/302041608/ https://www.fold3.com/document/302041587/ https://www.fold3.com/document/302041620/
This should at minimum verify the sources. But do we need to clutter up with these link/things
Veradrive ( talk) 14:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
I understand the WP:RS.
Sources: I believe my source(s) are acceptable. Do you have any concern about the specific source reports I am citing. If so please describe.
References: These reports do not fit the mold of a simple book reference. Do you have any formatting guidance for listing a "report" reference of this type. If so please describe.
References: The reference included in the existing article is a general footnote reference to the overall section. Please provide your opinion of the type of reference you feel I should use based on the additions you see I want to make. Either...
A. A general footnote reference to the overall section I add to or... B. An inline citation footnote for each addition
I don't want to cause confusion or conflicts with the existing reference nor cause further back and forth incomplete discussions ad nauseum. thanks Veradrive ( talk) 16:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
VP-HL-1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mztourist Please provide very..... very specific instruction/example on what you believe are acceptable guidelines for the reference sources I followed up with that you have undone. We need to avoid further cryptic reasons that I can't act on. I provided the following:
This article references additional operational events cited from the following US Navy Declassified public domain reports regarding the VP-HL-1/VPB-116 through authority of E. O. 13526 by: NDC, NARA Date 12/31/2012. The reports are available through Fold 3 by Ancestry.com as follows: 2. Squadron History – Patrol Bombing Squadron VPB-116 1943-1945 3. Aircraft Action Reports - VPB-116 1943-1945 4. War Diaries - VPB-116 1943-1945
What more is specifically needed?
Specific web links? Here are some such as...
https://www.fold3.com/document/295840383/ https://www.fold3.com/document/287147638/ https://www.fold3.com/document/302041608/ https://www.fold3.com/document/302041587/ https://www.fold3.com/document/302041620/
This should at minimum verify the sources. But do we need to clutter up with these link/things
Veradrive ( talk) 14:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
I understand the WP:RS.
Sources: I believe my source(s) are acceptable. Do you have any concern about the specific source reports I am citing. If so please describe.
References: These reports do not fit the mold of a simple book reference. Do you have any formatting guidance for listing a "report" reference of this type. If so please describe.
References: The reference included in the existing article is a general footnote reference to the overall section. Please provide your opinion of the type of reference you feel I should use based on the additions you see I want to make. Either...
A. A general footnote reference to the overall section I add to or... B. An inline citation footnote for each addition
I don't want to cause confusion or conflicts with the existing reference nor cause further back and forth incomplete discussions ad nauseum. thanks Veradrive ( talk) 16:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)