This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / Cold War This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Extensive Wikification is needed. Do the Significant events, Homeport assignments, and Aircraft assignments sections.

Also update everything since 1988 or so, using information from the VP-16 website. They have a new aircraft, and they have some additional history. Lou Sander ( talk) 16:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply

@ GraemeLeggett: I agree that deleting Naval Aviation is OK, but the other two, IMHO, are needed for non-experts who might consult the article. The one on Patrol Aircraft (don't remember the exact name) is especially key. The one on Squadrons is less so, but is helpful if one doesn't know what an aircraft squadron consists of (which, IMHO, is most people). Lou Sander ( talk) 14:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

To my mind "maritime patrol aircraft" and "squadron" are probably understood in general terms by a wide range of readers, but no reason not to include the links. It is probably better that the terms are included further up in the article, so I've edited the lede paragraph to include the links in a natural form. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 15:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Nice solution! Lou Sander ( talk) 17:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Some of the items here came from DANAS, where they are more or less styled as bullet points of history. Some came (I think) from the history on the squadron's website, where they were styled as narrative (BTW they seem to be unreferenced). Wanting to create uniformity, I made them all into bullet points. They could, of course, be rewritten all into narrative form, or all into bullet point form.

Some may disagree, but I don't think it's necessary to cite the source for each point. This is uncontroversial material, and probably it's OK just to cite both sources jointly for the whole section. Lou Sander ( talk) 18:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC) reply