![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not too familiar with all of Wikipedia's rules, but is it OK for a company to make a page about their product and to structure the article in the format of an advertisement? If so, then that's fine. Otherwise, this article needs to be removed. It's just that all the problems and issues with this model aren't mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.52.43 ( talk) 23:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
The permutations section is heavy on math claims. Certainly, some of this product's notability must arise from its difficulty. For this reason, we need to see non- primary and reliable sources publishing this information on the the product. Asking the reader to trust the information on the manufacturer's site alone, without ability to verify via a secondary source, is not encyclopedic. This, per WP:PRIMARY. I have tagged the section as such. At first glance, it looks like other parts of the article may need similar scrutiny. -- Ds13 ( talk) 04:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I think there is a mistake or at least a invalid simplification in the permutations section: The sentence "An odd permutation of the corner cubelets implies an odd permutation of the center cubelets, and vice versa; however, even and odd permutations are indistinguishable because of identically colored center cubelets." is not really correct because when you turn one of the inner layers you get an even permutation on the corner cubelets and an odd permutation of the center cubelets which do not lie on the diagonal of the cube's face! -- 88.130.216.153 ( talk) 18:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I believe there's another mistake here. The article states that any permutation of the corners is possible, including odd permutations. However, the only move that will change the relative position of the corners is rotating a face slice (an outer layer), and in this respect the corner pieces should be equivalent to a mini-cube—thus there should be only 8!x3^7 positions for them, not 8!x3^8. If you see a way to change the "polarity" of the corners in a V-6 (or ANY size) cube, please explain. Mathematically I don't see it. (Sorry if I'm not signing this edit correctly.) 24 Oct 2013
This article looks like it needs more blue links
Yeah dude, PowerUserPCDude was here (yeah) ( talk) 23:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Nowadays, it's not just V-Cube that makes 6x6s. Chinese manufacturers such as ShengShou, YuXin, MoYu and QiYi have their own 6x6 speedcubes. Pickaxe24 ( talk) 00:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
This article should be less biased to the V-Cube 6, it is okay to make a article about a company without sponsoring anything, but the article v-cube should exist, along with the seperated 6x6, 7x7 etc.
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not too familiar with all of Wikipedia's rules, but is it OK for a company to make a page about their product and to structure the article in the format of an advertisement? If so, then that's fine. Otherwise, this article needs to be removed. It's just that all the problems and issues with this model aren't mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.52.43 ( talk) 23:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
The permutations section is heavy on math claims. Certainly, some of this product's notability must arise from its difficulty. For this reason, we need to see non- primary and reliable sources publishing this information on the the product. Asking the reader to trust the information on the manufacturer's site alone, without ability to verify via a secondary source, is not encyclopedic. This, per WP:PRIMARY. I have tagged the section as such. At first glance, it looks like other parts of the article may need similar scrutiny. -- Ds13 ( talk) 04:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I think there is a mistake or at least a invalid simplification in the permutations section: The sentence "An odd permutation of the corner cubelets implies an odd permutation of the center cubelets, and vice versa; however, even and odd permutations are indistinguishable because of identically colored center cubelets." is not really correct because when you turn one of the inner layers you get an even permutation on the corner cubelets and an odd permutation of the center cubelets which do not lie on the diagonal of the cube's face! -- 88.130.216.153 ( talk) 18:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I believe there's another mistake here. The article states that any permutation of the corners is possible, including odd permutations. However, the only move that will change the relative position of the corners is rotating a face slice (an outer layer), and in this respect the corner pieces should be equivalent to a mini-cube—thus there should be only 8!x3^7 positions for them, not 8!x3^8. If you see a way to change the "polarity" of the corners in a V-6 (or ANY size) cube, please explain. Mathematically I don't see it. (Sorry if I'm not signing this edit correctly.) 24 Oct 2013
This article looks like it needs more blue links
Yeah dude, PowerUserPCDude was here (yeah) ( talk) 23:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Nowadays, it's not just V-Cube that makes 6x6s. Chinese manufacturers such as ShengShou, YuXin, MoYu and QiYi have their own 6x6 speedcubes. Pickaxe24 ( talk) 00:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
This article should be less biased to the V-Cube 6, it is okay to make a article about a company without sponsoring anything, but the article v-cube should exist, along with the seperated 6x6, 7x7 etc.