This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to
classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the
guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the
project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from Utrecht Te Deum and Jubilate appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 February 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This box still has abbreviations despite the consensus now to use them. Should they simply be deleted? --Kleinzach 02:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)reply
We are still developing an article on the instruments of the Baroque period. Why change now and then again when that is good enough? I don't think any reader is hurt by an abbreviation he may not understand. - In some infoboxes the abbreviations were replaced by simply saying "instruments", - I don't see how that is any better. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 22:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Kleinzach, maybe spell out the instruments, or give number of instrumental parts?
Nikkimaria (
talk) 22:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to
classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the
guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the
project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from Utrecht Te Deum and Jubilate appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 February 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This box still has abbreviations despite the consensus now to use them. Should they simply be deleted? --Kleinzach 02:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)reply
We are still developing an article on the instruments of the Baroque period. Why change now and then again when that is good enough? I don't think any reader is hurt by an abbreviation he may not understand. - In some infoboxes the abbreviations were replaced by simply saying "instruments", - I don't see how that is any better. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 22:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Kleinzach, maybe spell out the instruments, or give number of instrumental parts?
Nikkimaria (
talk) 22:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)reply