![]() | Urwa ibn al-Zubayr has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 12, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Urwa ibn al-Zubayr appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cplakidas ( talk · contribs) 17:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
Will gladly take this on, but it will be some days before I get to it. Constantine ✍ 17:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
That's it. Excellent article, comprehensive and informative, well written and understandable by a non-expert, with impeccable references. A pleasure to review :) Constantine ✍ 13:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk) 01:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by AhmadLX ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Urwa ibn al-Zubayr; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
@
AhmadLX: Good article. Needs a QPQ though.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 20:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello 156.196.169.59, I'm not sure whether I understand the rationale given in your edits [1] [2] changing "modern historians" to "modern Western Historians", but even if only Western historians "have debated the authenticity of the Urwa corpus of traditions" (which I think is a questionable statement), I don't see why it would be relevant to mention that in this context? What difference does it make, in this particular context, whether the historians doing the research are 'Western' or not? ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 15:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Urwa ibn al-Zubayr has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 12, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Urwa ibn al-Zubayr appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cplakidas ( talk · contribs) 17:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
Will gladly take this on, but it will be some days before I get to it. Constantine ✍ 17:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
That's it. Excellent article, comprehensive and informative, well written and understandable by a non-expert, with impeccable references. A pleasure to review :) Constantine ✍ 13:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk) 01:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by AhmadLX ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Urwa ibn al-Zubayr; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
@
AhmadLX: Good article. Needs a QPQ though.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 20:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello 156.196.169.59, I'm not sure whether I understand the rationale given in your edits [1] [2] changing "modern historians" to "modern Western Historians", but even if only Western historians "have debated the authenticity of the Urwa corpus of traditions" (which I think is a questionable statement), I don't see why it would be relevant to mention that in this context? What difference does it make, in this particular context, whether the historians doing the research are 'Western' or not? ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 15:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)