| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is there any substantive difference between this group and Los Incas other than a name change? If not, we ought to merge these articles. -- GentlemanGhost ( talk) 19:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- I think they should be merged. Same band, just changed its name and then back again. Los Incas was the once and future name, so I think that should be the title. -- Allen ( talk) 01:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem different enough from Los Incas to stand on its own to me. It mostly repeats stuff from that article, and anything not from there could improve it by being merged into it. A lot of sources I've seen seem treat them separately though, I don't really get why. -- Jessietail ( talk) 10:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is there any substantive difference between this group and Los Incas other than a name change? If not, we ought to merge these articles. -- GentlemanGhost ( talk) 19:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- I think they should be merged. Same band, just changed its name and then back again. Los Incas was the once and future name, so I think that should be the title. -- Allen ( talk) 01:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem different enough from Los Incas to stand on its own to me. It mostly repeats stuff from that article, and anything not from there could improve it by being merged into it. A lot of sources I've seen seem treat them separately though, I don't really get why. -- Jessietail ( talk) 10:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)