I hate to gripe, but this appears to just be the Tirion article (linked to below) copied and pasted. Is that usual practice? -- User:Lesonyrra 22:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I hereby propose to merge the stubby article Celestial atlas, that I once wrote, because that article treats the same topic as this, and that there's currently no risk of too long and extensive articles. Therefore I propose that the Celestial atlas text is integrated into this text, and that Celestial atlas redirects to Uranography. Rursus 09:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
New title is as yet undecided, the word "celestiography" is discarded (because I couldn't find it in my Swedish-English dictionary). Rursus 12:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I decide for the title " star cartography". Many won't like it, some like me, will think it's a "bastard" formulation, but "star charts" and how they're produced, that's the topic. Said: Rursus 19:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Errrrrrr, how about the article Start chart? You might want to merge that one as well. Wammes Waggle ( talk) 17:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Now, I'm integrating everything into Star cartography. If the term must be changed, then we'll do it by a move later. Said: Rursus 20:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
article source |
fact in- tegration status¹) |
source status²) |
notes |
---|---|---|---|
Celestial atlas | not in dest | redirecting | I wrote that article once upon a time. It has no value. I deem it could be deleted without even reviewing it. It s*x(ed)! |
Star atlas | covered by dest | redirecting | |
Stellar cartography | covered by dest | redirecting | |
Uranography | partially in dest ³) | mergescreamed | this text cannot be merged without heavy rewrite. Tirion kindly gives us the permission to use this text, but what we need is a GFDLed text. |
I made a redirect-only page from my Celestial atlas, because it was so extremely poorly written. Said: Rursus 06:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
My notes moved to Talk:Star cartography. Said: Rursus 13:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
I hate to gripe, but this appears to just be the Tirion article (linked to below) copied and pasted. Is that usual practice? -- User:Lesonyrra 22:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I hereby propose to merge the stubby article Celestial atlas, that I once wrote, because that article treats the same topic as this, and that there's currently no risk of too long and extensive articles. Therefore I propose that the Celestial atlas text is integrated into this text, and that Celestial atlas redirects to Uranography. Rursus 09:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
New title is as yet undecided, the word "celestiography" is discarded (because I couldn't find it in my Swedish-English dictionary). Rursus 12:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I decide for the title " star cartography". Many won't like it, some like me, will think it's a "bastard" formulation, but "star charts" and how they're produced, that's the topic. Said: Rursus 19:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Errrrrrr, how about the article Start chart? You might want to merge that one as well. Wammes Waggle ( talk) 17:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Now, I'm integrating everything into Star cartography. If the term must be changed, then we'll do it by a move later. Said: Rursus 20:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
article source |
fact in- tegration status¹) |
source status²) |
notes |
---|---|---|---|
Celestial atlas | not in dest | redirecting | I wrote that article once upon a time. It has no value. I deem it could be deleted without even reviewing it. It s*x(ed)! |
Star atlas | covered by dest | redirecting | |
Stellar cartography | covered by dest | redirecting | |
Uranography | partially in dest ³) | mergescreamed | this text cannot be merged without heavy rewrite. Tirion kindly gives us the permission to use this text, but what we need is a GFDLed text. |
I made a redirect-only page from my Celestial atlas, because it was so extremely poorly written. Said: Rursus 06:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
My notes moved to Talk:Star cartography. Said: Rursus 13:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)