Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. The article is very good. I have one question.

• Did you follow these guidelines: Wikipedia:Music samples? — Mattisse ( Talk) 21:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Yes. Dan56 ( talk) 22:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Final GA review (see here for criteria) reply

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b ( MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c ( OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This is an excellent article. Congradulations! — Mattisse ( Talk) 22:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply