![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Why does the Atlanta school get to be at John Marshall Law School when this school is older and has been ABA accredited since the 50s, while the Atlanta school is not yet fully accredited? At the very least, John Marshall Law School should be a disambiguation page. john k ( talk) 03:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Marshall Law School (Chicago). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Yesterday, I'd added this at the end of the introduction, which looked most apt, since there's no History or appropriate section:
despite Chief Justice Marshall’s legacy as one of the nation’s most significant U.S. Supreme Court justices, the newly discovered research regarding his role as a slave trader, slave owner of hundreds of slaves, pro-slavery jurisprudence and racist views render him a highly inappropriate namesake for the law school.
@ ElKevbo: First, I don't see why you chose to delete the above in the first place, being factual and sourced (and, clearly, the source suits you). Secondly, I think it was more appropriately included than it is now, taking over the lead, as the second sentence of a three-paragraph introduction; it seems a little tabloid in the high-profile placement you've given the now truncated facts. Thirdly, you left out a crucial historical detail, as it pertains to bias, in omitting the recentness of the evidence assessed by the task force, which you also left out:
Your reverts followed by your rewrites don't appear very collaborative, but may lay waste to a thoughtful addition, as well as the impetus to make a History section, currently lacking. (I'd have done that today, but am obviously doing this instead.)
References
Caught my eye — Source #3: how could a 2019 stat be found in 2016? The archived copy is from 2015. The linked "original" however, is a 2019 doc. The numbers match up for the previously linked ABA PDF, so I deleted the 2015 Wayback link, which seems to have no bearing, and updated the rest. Lindenfall ( talk) 22:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Why does the Atlanta school get to be at John Marshall Law School when this school is older and has been ABA accredited since the 50s, while the Atlanta school is not yet fully accredited? At the very least, John Marshall Law School should be a disambiguation page. john k ( talk) 03:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Marshall Law School (Chicago). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Yesterday, I'd added this at the end of the introduction, which looked most apt, since there's no History or appropriate section:
despite Chief Justice Marshall’s legacy as one of the nation’s most significant U.S. Supreme Court justices, the newly discovered research regarding his role as a slave trader, slave owner of hundreds of slaves, pro-slavery jurisprudence and racist views render him a highly inappropriate namesake for the law school.
@ ElKevbo: First, I don't see why you chose to delete the above in the first place, being factual and sourced (and, clearly, the source suits you). Secondly, I think it was more appropriately included than it is now, taking over the lead, as the second sentence of a three-paragraph introduction; it seems a little tabloid in the high-profile placement you've given the now truncated facts. Thirdly, you left out a crucial historical detail, as it pertains to bias, in omitting the recentness of the evidence assessed by the task force, which you also left out:
Your reverts followed by your rewrites don't appear very collaborative, but may lay waste to a thoughtful addition, as well as the impetus to make a History section, currently lacking. (I'd have done that today, but am obviously doing this instead.)
References
Caught my eye — Source #3: how could a 2019 stat be found in 2016? The archived copy is from 2015. The linked "original" however, is a 2019 doc. The numbers match up for the previously linked ABA PDF, so I deleted the 2015 Wayback link, which seems to have no bearing, and updated the rest. Lindenfall ( talk) 22:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)