@
Trivialist: Agree --
Rezonansowy (
talk •
contribs)
22:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Disagree don't merge to
Internet Archive. This is an article about an important slogan. The references for this slogan is enough to be an independent article.
DZTREQWS (
talk)
10:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Agree Yes, this is a slogan, for goodness' sake. It contains no elusive references, simply putting the idea (which is not unique to the Internet Archive) into plain words.
Imaginatorium (
talk)
04:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unsure - this has implications about Open content and Open access and education and preservation. The Libre word seems to sum up a lot of this philosophy, maybe more could be added to the History section of the internet archive section about how the philosophy is like other movements. -- Aronzak ( talk) 15:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
The slogan doesn't seem notable in itself, but I don't know if it should redirect to Freedom of information, Libre knowledge, Open knowledge, Access to knowledge movement, or what.-- Brainy J ~✿~ ( talk) 16:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Disagree This is a notable slogan.
((YTZA)) (
talk)
13:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Definitely merge. Agree . The above user also has no activity outside of edits to this topic. I'm guessing conflict of interest here?
Broken
Segue
21:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)\
Disagree This slogan is too important in and of its own right to not be included in its own page.
2602:306:3006:8A90:9832:948C:81EF:BB80 (
talk)
05:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Agree Yes, it's a good slogan, but the article as it is is a stub. The slogan has no use outside of the
Internet Archive. –
Zumoarirodoka
(talk)
(email)
16:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Agree This slogan's own notability remains undemonstrated and is confounded by the notability of the Internet Archive itself.
fgnievinski (
talk)
15:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
@
Trivialist: Agree --
Rezonansowy (
talk •
contribs)
22:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Disagree don't merge to
Internet Archive. This is an article about an important slogan. The references for this slogan is enough to be an independent article.
DZTREQWS (
talk)
10:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Agree Yes, this is a slogan, for goodness' sake. It contains no elusive references, simply putting the idea (which is not unique to the Internet Archive) into plain words.
Imaginatorium (
talk)
04:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unsure - this has implications about Open content and Open access and education and preservation. The Libre word seems to sum up a lot of this philosophy, maybe more could be added to the History section of the internet archive section about how the philosophy is like other movements. -- Aronzak ( talk) 15:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
The slogan doesn't seem notable in itself, but I don't know if it should redirect to Freedom of information, Libre knowledge, Open knowledge, Access to knowledge movement, or what.-- Brainy J ~✿~ ( talk) 16:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Disagree This is a notable slogan.
((YTZA)) (
talk)
13:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Definitely merge. Agree . The above user also has no activity outside of edits to this topic. I'm guessing conflict of interest here?
Broken
Segue
21:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)\
Disagree This slogan is too important in and of its own right to not be included in its own page.
2602:306:3006:8A90:9832:948C:81EF:BB80 (
talk)
05:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Agree Yes, it's a good slogan, but the article as it is is a stub. The slogan has no use outside of the
Internet Archive. –
Zumoarirodoka
(talk)
(email)
16:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Agree This slogan's own notability remains undemonstrated and is confounded by the notability of the Internet Archive itself.
fgnievinski (
talk)
15:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)