This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who writes these chinese articles? the engrish is TERRIBLE, I could revise and edit all day and someone would just revert it to the grammatically frightening version just because it has more CPC propaganda.
But you don't realize that your propaganda is in bad english, so it's REALLY EASY TO TELL THAT ITS PROPAGANDA. 70.102.63.186 ( talk) 17:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I didn't realize the term "united front" had been used in regard to Hong Kong. I have recently frequently heard the term recently heard regarding China's attempts to annex Taiwan and have started a United Front Doctrine article. Now that I see this article, I'm concerned that we use correct names in such a way as to disambiguate the two strategies. Does anyone have any suggestions? Readin ( talk) 23:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who writes these chinese articles? the engrish is TERRIBLE, I could revise and edit all day and someone would just revert it to the grammatically frightening version just because it has more CPC propaganda.
But you don't realize that your propaganda is in bad english, so it's REALLY EASY TO TELL THAT ITS PROPAGANDA. 70.102.63.186 ( talk) 17:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I didn't realize the term "united front" had been used in regard to Hong Kong. I have recently frequently heard the term recently heard regarding China's attempts to annex Taiwan and have started a United Front Doctrine article. Now that I see this article, I'm concerned that we use correct names in such a way as to disambiguate the two strategies. Does anyone have any suggestions? Readin ( talk) 23:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)