![]() | United States v. Washington is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 23, 2015, and on October 12, 2021. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 2, 2015. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after
United States v. Washington, a Congressman said that "the fishing issue was to Washington state what
busing was to the East"? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The case has significant negative citation history - while it may still be narrow law (and I am not sure of even that), I think it might be deceptive to say that it has held for 30 years. Is anyone more familiar with this case in a position to set me straight here? Editor Emeritus 16:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
This book, much of which is online in Google Books, has lots of info about this case:
Wilkinson, Charles F. (2005). Blood Struggle: The Rise of Modern Indian Nations. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 165. ISBN 0393051498.
- Pete ( talk) 18:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
This article does not list anything about the appellate history - unless there is objection, I will work on restructuring the article to show this history. GregJackP Boomer! 12:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Is the text of Boldt's decision available online anywhere? And if not, does anyone know where best to look for a copy? - Jmabel | Talk 02:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Coemgenus ( talk · contribs) 14:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this one over the next few days. -- Coemgenus ( talk) 14:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
That's all I have. Sorry this took so long! Looking forward to your responses. -- Coemgenus ( talk) 21:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Reponses
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/United States v. Washington -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I have just gone through the article and made a number of minor edits, mostly to correct good-faith attempts to improve the article. The key thing I noted is the change of the ". . ." (Bluebook citation ellipsis) to the common "..." ellipsis. GregJackP Boomer! 17:51, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
This article is promarily about the Boldt Decision, but when it comes to fishing rights in the PNW, it seems that the Belloni Decision, coming from Sohappy v. Smith a few years prior, is similarly important legal precedent.
Recently Sohappy v. Smith was proposed for deletion. As a result, Urve and I have explored that case and its connections to this one. We're both a little uncertain: Is the best approach to merge what little content exists there into this article, and redirect here, or to build out that article to be a little more thorough? It seems as though one or the other of those approaches is needed, as the current stub-like article is not particularly informative, and even lead me (the creator of that article) to get confused between United States v. Washington and United States v. Oregon. Neither of us are expert in complex legal cases, so some help from someone more conversant in this area would be most welcome.
Please see the proposed merge section on that article's talk page. - Pete Forsyth ( talk) 03:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Treaty Justice: The Northwest Tribes, the Boldt Decision, and the Recognition of Fishing Rights is a new (2024) book out by Charles Wilkerson whose previous book is cited in the article. There is a lot of information in the book and footnotes if anyone is looking to update or expand this article. @Auldhouse Auldhouse ( talk) 23:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | United States v. Washington is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 23, 2015, and on October 12, 2021. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 2, 2015. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after
United States v. Washington, a Congressman said that "the fishing issue was to Washington state what
busing was to the East"? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The case has significant negative citation history - while it may still be narrow law (and I am not sure of even that), I think it might be deceptive to say that it has held for 30 years. Is anyone more familiar with this case in a position to set me straight here? Editor Emeritus 16:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
This book, much of which is online in Google Books, has lots of info about this case:
Wilkinson, Charles F. (2005). Blood Struggle: The Rise of Modern Indian Nations. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 165. ISBN 0393051498.
- Pete ( talk) 18:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
This article does not list anything about the appellate history - unless there is objection, I will work on restructuring the article to show this history. GregJackP Boomer! 12:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Is the text of Boldt's decision available online anywhere? And if not, does anyone know where best to look for a copy? - Jmabel | Talk 02:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Coemgenus ( talk · contribs) 14:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this one over the next few days. -- Coemgenus ( talk) 14:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
That's all I have. Sorry this took so long! Looking forward to your responses. -- Coemgenus ( talk) 21:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Reponses
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/United States v. Washington -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I have just gone through the article and made a number of minor edits, mostly to correct good-faith attempts to improve the article. The key thing I noted is the change of the ". . ." (Bluebook citation ellipsis) to the common "..." ellipsis. GregJackP Boomer! 17:51, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
This article is promarily about the Boldt Decision, but when it comes to fishing rights in the PNW, it seems that the Belloni Decision, coming from Sohappy v. Smith a few years prior, is similarly important legal precedent.
Recently Sohappy v. Smith was proposed for deletion. As a result, Urve and I have explored that case and its connections to this one. We're both a little uncertain: Is the best approach to merge what little content exists there into this article, and redirect here, or to build out that article to be a little more thorough? It seems as though one or the other of those approaches is needed, as the current stub-like article is not particularly informative, and even lead me (the creator of that article) to get confused between United States v. Washington and United States v. Oregon. Neither of us are expert in complex legal cases, so some help from someone more conversant in this area would be most welcome.
Please see the proposed merge section on that article's talk page. - Pete Forsyth ( talk) 03:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Treaty Justice: The Northwest Tribes, the Boldt Decision, and the Recognition of Fishing Rights is a new (2024) book out by Charles Wilkerson whose previous book is cited in the article. There is a lot of information in the book and footnotes if anyone is looking to update or expand this article. @Auldhouse Auldhouse ( talk) 23:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)