This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States v. Progressive, Inc. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | United States v. Progressive, Inc. is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 2, 2013. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)I'll try improving this article with this source soon. ;)— Cirt ( talk) 18:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
These sects of these two related articles have some good sourced info that could be incorporated here into this article, as well. ;)— Cirt ( talk) 18:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Removed newly added info from sect, Background. Let's please not get into the habit of adding info without page numbers in cites, let's maintain a high standard for new info added to this page, please.— Cirt ( talk) 05:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Suggest we junk it or move it to the talk page. It's not really doing anything at the moment, and eventually we'll substitute it with Notes and References sect.— Cirt ( talk) 06:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
— Cirt ( talk) 19:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks very much for this info! So what building would that have been?— Cirt ( talk) 13:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Date format should be USA. I notice so far the text uses both conflicting USA and UK date formats. This case is entirely about USA material, so it should use USA date format.— Cirt ( talk) 21:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
The sect on Prior restraint should have some history and background info on prior legal doctrine and case precedent on prior restraint law in the United States.— Cirt ( talk) 23:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Not sure why stuff was removed from See also sect?— Cirt ( talk) 23:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Well I hope we at least keep the ones currently there now. :)— Cirt ( talk) 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This article is supposed to be about United States v. The Progressive, but it seems to be getting over-burdened by background info. Maybe we can trim some sects down, with links in those sects to more info on the respective parent articles?— Cirt ( talk) 23:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Has the great improvements to this very interesting article some time ago ceased altogether? The User 567 ( talk) 09:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
So if Wikipedia is not censored, does that mean that if someone happened to know the details behind the Teller-Ulam design they could add that information to either this or the Teller-Ulam design article; assuming the reference was from a peer reviewed journal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CensoredScribe ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
The important role played by Ray Kidder deserves a mention. Accordingly, I have added a paragraph and three footnotes. HowardMorland ( talk) 17:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
I cleared up some confusion about which letter was published by the Daily Californian (it was the Argonne letter, not the Hansen letter). In adjusting the footnotes I used the page numbers from the online pdf version of the DeVolpi, et al. book, which are different from the hard copy page numbers. HowardMorland ( talk) 05:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United States v. Progressive, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States v. Progressive, Inc. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | United States v. Progressive, Inc. is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 2, 2013. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)I'll try improving this article with this source soon. ;)— Cirt ( talk) 18:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
These sects of these two related articles have some good sourced info that could be incorporated here into this article, as well. ;)— Cirt ( talk) 18:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Removed newly added info from sect, Background. Let's please not get into the habit of adding info without page numbers in cites, let's maintain a high standard for new info added to this page, please.— Cirt ( talk) 05:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Suggest we junk it or move it to the talk page. It's not really doing anything at the moment, and eventually we'll substitute it with Notes and References sect.— Cirt ( talk) 06:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
— Cirt ( talk) 19:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks very much for this info! So what building would that have been?— Cirt ( talk) 13:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Date format should be USA. I notice so far the text uses both conflicting USA and UK date formats. This case is entirely about USA material, so it should use USA date format.— Cirt ( talk) 21:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
The sect on Prior restraint should have some history and background info on prior legal doctrine and case precedent on prior restraint law in the United States.— Cirt ( talk) 23:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Not sure why stuff was removed from See also sect?— Cirt ( talk) 23:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Well I hope we at least keep the ones currently there now. :)— Cirt ( talk) 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This article is supposed to be about United States v. The Progressive, but it seems to be getting over-burdened by background info. Maybe we can trim some sects down, with links in those sects to more info on the respective parent articles?— Cirt ( talk) 23:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Has the great improvements to this very interesting article some time ago ceased altogether? The User 567 ( talk) 09:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
So if Wikipedia is not censored, does that mean that if someone happened to know the details behind the Teller-Ulam design they could add that information to either this or the Teller-Ulam design article; assuming the reference was from a peer reviewed journal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CensoredScribe ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
The important role played by Ray Kidder deserves a mention. Accordingly, I have added a paragraph and three footnotes. HowardMorland ( talk) 17:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
I cleared up some confusion about which letter was published by the Daily Californian (it was the Argonne letter, not the Hansen letter). In adjusting the footnotes I used the page numbers from the online pdf version of the DeVolpi, et al. book, which are different from the hard copy page numbers. HowardMorland ( talk) 05:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United States v. Progressive, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)