This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is being revised over the next month as part of the Cyberlaw WikiProject. Sea Guardian ( talk) 02:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I greatly disagree with the importance rating of "Low" on this article, as evidenced by the fact that at least one member of Congress thinks the ruling important enough to propose legislation. I see the "Mid" rating assigned to topics far more obscure. Kevin ( talk) 15:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply