This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States Space Force article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | United States Space Force is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Upon further research, I seem to have uncovered a problem. The lede states that the Space Force Act, sponsored by Congressmen Jim Cooper and Mike Rogers
. The body doesn't support that. My research turns up that:
It is not clear that the Space Force Act was sponsored by Representatives Cooper and Rogers. It could have been sponsored by Senators. It could have been edited from the Trump administration Department of Defense. This needs to be cleared up. starship .paint ( exalt) 06:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Space Corps proposal from the house was adopted word for word and inserted into the senate legislation. Compare law versus the House version. For example, the law discusses: ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE FOR SPACE ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION. In another example, the law discusses an "Acquisition Council". Does the House version do either of that? I don't think so. starship .paint ( exalt) 02:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Space Force Act, sponsored by Congressmen Jim Cooper and Mike Rogers. starship .paint ( exalt) 09:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
… differences between the legislative proposal submitted by the Department of Defense, the NDAA language from the Senate, and the accompanying language from the House of Representatives […] it is clear that the final NDAA language walked the line between the Senate and the House desires for the Space Force. While the decision on Title 10 authorities favored the House, many of the details of implementation favored the Senate, including the name of the new service and how space acquisition would be structured.starship .paint ( exalt) 11:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The non-US Space Force article states Russia was first in 1992. Their space force doesn't exist any more but it obviously makes the US not the first. 79.152.125.122 ( talk) 07:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Should the discussion on why the Space Force used army/air force ranks versus naval officer rank structure be added? Jrpotts ( talk) 00:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Both the NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps page and the United States Space Force page claim to describe the smallest uniformed service of the United States. 35.142.185.91 ( talk) 07:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States Space Force article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | United States Space Force is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Upon further research, I seem to have uncovered a problem. The lede states that the Space Force Act, sponsored by Congressmen Jim Cooper and Mike Rogers
. The body doesn't support that. My research turns up that:
It is not clear that the Space Force Act was sponsored by Representatives Cooper and Rogers. It could have been sponsored by Senators. It could have been edited from the Trump administration Department of Defense. This needs to be cleared up. starship .paint ( exalt) 06:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Space Corps proposal from the house was adopted word for word and inserted into the senate legislation. Compare law versus the House version. For example, the law discusses: ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE FOR SPACE ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION. In another example, the law discusses an "Acquisition Council". Does the House version do either of that? I don't think so. starship .paint ( exalt) 02:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Space Force Act, sponsored by Congressmen Jim Cooper and Mike Rogers. starship .paint ( exalt) 09:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
… differences between the legislative proposal submitted by the Department of Defense, the NDAA language from the Senate, and the accompanying language from the House of Representatives […] it is clear that the final NDAA language walked the line between the Senate and the House desires for the Space Force. While the decision on Title 10 authorities favored the House, many of the details of implementation favored the Senate, including the name of the new service and how space acquisition would be structured.starship .paint ( exalt) 11:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The non-US Space Force article states Russia was first in 1992. Their space force doesn't exist any more but it obviously makes the US not the first. 79.152.125.122 ( talk) 07:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Should the discussion on why the Space Force used army/air force ranks versus naval officer rank structure be added? Jrpotts ( talk) 00:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Both the NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps page and the United States Space Force page claim to describe the smallest uniformed service of the United States. 35.142.185.91 ( talk) 07:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)