![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
My rational behind using {{Infobox Officeholder, is at this time we do not have a infobox (template) for government department. {{Infobox Officeholder has the information needed to be displayed to the reader and quickly get an idea of the department.
Second, because it is a template it is very easy to edit. Whereas the infobox used at United States Secretary of Homeland Security is a homebrewed table, which can not be easily changed. With 100s of departments within the government there would be many wasted hours of editing in the future.
it also makes it easier for bots to make auto changes.
Until someone comes up with a better template for government departments , I think we should continue using {{Infobox Officeholde -- Jeanenawhitney 10:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
My rational behind using {{Infobox Officeholder, is at this time we do not have a infobox (template) for government department. {{Infobox Officeholder has the information needed to be displayed to the reader and quickly get an idea of the department.
Second, because it is a template it is very easy to edit. Whereas the infobox used at United States Secretary of Homeland Security is a homebrewed table, which can not be easily changed. With 100s of departments within the government there would be many wasted hours of editing in the future.
it also makes it easier for bots to make auto changes.
Until someone comes up with a better template for government departments , I think we should continue using {{Infobox Officeholde -- Jeanenawhitney 10:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)