From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this article necessary?

If the USMCA is the continuation of NAFTA (as I understand it to be) wouldn't it be more appropriate to just update the article for NAFTA instead of creating a separate page? - Bokmanrocks01 ( talk) 04:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

It is still a new agreement but is based off of many parts of NAFTA. Entirely deserving of being a separate article for the many new additions, modernization and history. As more information becomes available, and goes through congress, the differences and need will become even more apparent.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitrous295 ( talkcontribs) 04:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this article necessary?

If the USMCA is the continuation of NAFTA (as I understand it to be) wouldn't it be more appropriate to just update the article for NAFTA instead of creating a separate page? - Bokmanrocks01 ( talk) 04:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

It is still a new agreement but is based off of many parts of NAFTA. Entirely deserving of being a separate article for the many new additions, modernization and history. As more information becomes available, and goes through congress, the differences and need will become even more apparent.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitrous295 ( talkcontribs) 04:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook