This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 22 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to USâTaliban Deal. The result of the discussion was moved to USâTaliban deal. |
Why is there no mention of Pompeo's role in this? https://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-taliban-talks/pompeo-lands-in-doha-for-launch-of-afghan-peace-talks-idUSKBN2620OY
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 15#The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. eĎ/ đŹ 21:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
The US Constitution requires "the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur". Did that happen? It seems like it did not happen. So is this not, legally, a treaty? User:ĺ (power~enwiki, Ď, ν)
Why is there a "better source needed" tag on a link to the US State Department's website? This is from a .gov domain, so it seems like a primary source to me. Jthemphill ( talk) 01:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved to USâTaliban deal. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 20:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Doha Agreement (2020) â USâTaliban Deal â Per WP:CONCISE, WP:COMMONNAME and WP:RECOGNIZABLE. The disambiguator in parenthesis will be no longer needed (no confusion with Doha Agreement (2008) and FatahâHamas Doha Agreement). Not only is the proposed title shorter, but also it accurately describes both the parties involved. On Google News, "Doha Agreement" gets about 5,370 results (which also include hundreds of irrelevant results about other Doha deals), but "US-Taliban Deal" gets about 9,240 results (which are exclusively about this deal), easily making "USâTaliban Deal" more common by a good margin. Also, we do not need to write the "United States" in full; we can use the "US" because we have other similar titles, e.g. the USâUK Mutual Defence Agreement. Khestwol ( talk) 09:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC) â Relisting. >>> Extorc. talk 12:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 22 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to USâTaliban Deal. The result of the discussion was moved to USâTaliban deal. |
Why is there no mention of Pompeo's role in this? https://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-taliban-talks/pompeo-lands-in-doha-for-launch-of-afghan-peace-talks-idUSKBN2620OY
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 15#The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. eĎ/ đŹ 21:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
The US Constitution requires "the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur". Did that happen? It seems like it did not happen. So is this not, legally, a treaty? User:ĺ (power~enwiki, Ď, ν)
Why is there a "better source needed" tag on a link to the US State Department's website? This is from a .gov domain, so it seems like a primary source to me. Jthemphill ( talk) 01:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved to USâTaliban deal. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 20:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Doha Agreement (2020) â USâTaliban Deal â Per WP:CONCISE, WP:COMMONNAME and WP:RECOGNIZABLE. The disambiguator in parenthesis will be no longer needed (no confusion with Doha Agreement (2008) and FatahâHamas Doha Agreement). Not only is the proposed title shorter, but also it accurately describes both the parties involved. On Google News, "Doha Agreement" gets about 5,370 results (which also include hundreds of irrelevant results about other Doha deals), but "US-Taliban Deal" gets about 9,240 results (which are exclusively about this deal), easily making "USâTaliban Deal" more common by a good margin. Also, we do not need to write the "United States" in full; we can use the "US" because we have other similar titles, e.g. the USâUK Mutual Defence Agreement. Khestwol ( talk) 09:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC) â Relisting. >>> Extorc. talk 12:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)