This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
The image is lovely but it is a later ballpark on the site, not the subject of the article. And there isn't enough text on 1878-1883 (not to say there should be) to support putting the image where it logically belongs. --
P64 02:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Gimme a chance and I'll add some text. Some of the greatest Chicago NL clubs played there.
Wahkeenah 02:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Lakefront Park I vs. Lakefront Park pages
There is a page called
Lakefront Park I that (briefly) covers the two Lakefront Parks, even though
Lakefront Park redirects here. There should probably be a decision on how to resolve the issue, either by separating the Union Grounds from Lakefront or merging the two. Thoughts?
EC2 20:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
The image is lovely but it is a later ballpark on the site, not the subject of the article. And there isn't enough text on 1878-1883 (not to say there should be) to support putting the image where it logically belongs. --
P64 02:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Gimme a chance and I'll add some text. Some of the greatest Chicago NL clubs played there.
Wahkeenah 02:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Lakefront Park I vs. Lakefront Park pages
There is a page called
Lakefront Park I that (briefly) covers the two Lakefront Parks, even though
Lakefront Park redirects here. There should probably be a decision on how to resolve the issue, either by separating the Union Grounds from Lakefront or merging the two. Thoughts?
EC2 20:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)reply