This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / British / European Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force British military history task force European military history task force

I don't believe the article should be deleted. Instead, I believe it should be a disambig page for the article. While it is true that this itself is not an encyclopedic entry, I personally would search for "British Armed Forces uniforms" if I wanted to know more about them, therefore a disambig page would be more appropriate.

As such, I am going to Be Bold and change the article to a disambig page (I will not be removing the prod tag)

m8e39 10:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Edited: m8e39 10:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The current photograph of a British Army uniform is out of date. It shows the desert variant of DPM which was replaced. It should be replaced with an image of the uniform that replaced it, MTP. -- Dreddmoto ( talk) 14:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply