This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Why is the image for "Order-5-4 rhombille tiling" missing? - dcljr ( talk) 02:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
A lot of Escher's art is based on tiling of the hyperbolic plane. It might be worthwhile to add links or images to his work. If you Google "escher tiling hyperbolic", you get many images of Escher's art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathPerson ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
"7 representing" and "active" are mysterious. — Tamfang ( talk) 08:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Can quadrilateral domains have infinite elements?
Also, can you have pentagon domains? hexagon domains? octagon domains? infinite domains? 99.185.0.100 ( talk) 14:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Like these domains? Tom Ruen ( talk) 17:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | ∞ |
---|---|---|---|---|
The article is quite large in Wikipedia:Article size Browser-page size. ( the size in bytes of the page with all pictures included.)
Be careful I am not talking the Wikipedia:Article sizeReadable-prose size or Wiki markup size. It is just this page contains a lot of pictures and takes long to load.
I think the page should therefore split up, but I have no idea yet on how to split it up. I think keep this article as a general page and then move the details to seperate pages, but what is general and what are the details? WillemienH ( talk) 10:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
For the moment I replaced all { { template tables } } with [ [template: template tables ] ] (links to the tables) not sure yet how further to reorganise the page, the whole representation needs improvement (more explanations) ideas welcome (as long as they lead to a much smaller Browser-page size than the original page. WillemienH ( talk) 19:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
There's this paper, but its definition is more restrictive than ours (e.g. 4.6.14 isn't allowed, because it has both left-handed and right-handed vertices). Double sharp ( talk) 04:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
There's a non-Wythoffian tiling in Euclidean plane ( elongated triangular tiling). There's also (at least) one non-Wythoffian honeycomb in hyperbolic 3-space ( partially diminished icosahedral honeycomb). Are there any non-Wythoffian tilings in hyperbolic plane? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.4.114.18 ( talk) 10:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
According to the article, the faces in these tilings are supposed to be regular polygons; however, plenty of them are seemingly not, for example the V3.3.3.3.3.4 tiling mentioned under Uniform tilings in hyperbolic plane#(4 3 3), the V3.3.4.3.5 tiling mentioned under (5 4 2), the V34.8 tiling under (8 3 2), and the V4.5.4.5 tiling under (5 5 2), as all of these have in common that each polygon shares some vertices with a certain number of other polygons, and other vertices with a different number of other polygons. This makes the angles differently large in different vertices, which makes the polygons non-regular. So if the tilings in this article are not all uniform, I think we need to figure out what they have in common and update the description of the article accordingly. — Kri ( talk) 08:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
please fix this 37.48.48.145 ( talk) 09:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Why is the image for "Order-5-4 rhombille tiling" missing? - dcljr ( talk) 02:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
A lot of Escher's art is based on tiling of the hyperbolic plane. It might be worthwhile to add links or images to his work. If you Google "escher tiling hyperbolic", you get many images of Escher's art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathPerson ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
"7 representing" and "active" are mysterious. — Tamfang ( talk) 08:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Can quadrilateral domains have infinite elements?
Also, can you have pentagon domains? hexagon domains? octagon domains? infinite domains? 99.185.0.100 ( talk) 14:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Like these domains? Tom Ruen ( talk) 17:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | ∞ |
---|---|---|---|---|
The article is quite large in Wikipedia:Article size Browser-page size. ( the size in bytes of the page with all pictures included.)
Be careful I am not talking the Wikipedia:Article sizeReadable-prose size or Wiki markup size. It is just this page contains a lot of pictures and takes long to load.
I think the page should therefore split up, but I have no idea yet on how to split it up. I think keep this article as a general page and then move the details to seperate pages, but what is general and what are the details? WillemienH ( talk) 10:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
For the moment I replaced all { { template tables } } with [ [template: template tables ] ] (links to the tables) not sure yet how further to reorganise the page, the whole representation needs improvement (more explanations) ideas welcome (as long as they lead to a much smaller Browser-page size than the original page. WillemienH ( talk) 19:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
There's this paper, but its definition is more restrictive than ours (e.g. 4.6.14 isn't allowed, because it has both left-handed and right-handed vertices). Double sharp ( talk) 04:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
There's a non-Wythoffian tiling in Euclidean plane ( elongated triangular tiling). There's also (at least) one non-Wythoffian honeycomb in hyperbolic 3-space ( partially diminished icosahedral honeycomb). Are there any non-Wythoffian tilings in hyperbolic plane? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.4.114.18 ( talk) 10:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
According to the article, the faces in these tilings are supposed to be regular polygons; however, plenty of them are seemingly not, for example the V3.3.3.3.3.4 tiling mentioned under Uniform tilings in hyperbolic plane#(4 3 3), the V3.3.4.3.5 tiling mentioned under (5 4 2), the V34.8 tiling under (8 3 2), and the V4.5.4.5 tiling under (5 5 2), as all of these have in common that each polygon shares some vertices with a certain number of other polygons, and other vertices with a different number of other polygons. This makes the angles differently large in different vertices, which makes the polygons non-regular. So if the tilings in this article are not all uniform, I think we need to figure out what they have in common and update the description of the article accordingly. — Kri ( talk) 08:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
please fix this 37.48.48.145 ( talk) 09:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)