This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are Dallas and Oakland grouped together and Pittsburgh and Washington each treated separately? Either Dallas and Oakland should be separated out into their own subsections, or all of the teams that don't retire jerseys should be in one section without being subdivided. gohlkus ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm looking for proof on this but I'm fairly sure that the chart is wrong where it lists DL and LB as "Yes" for numbers 30-39 and 40-49. These numbers, as far as I am aware, are only usable by TE/RB/DB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.216.200.145 ( talk) 20:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
The chart was made based on the information that was there before it. If there's some sort of reliable source of information regarding the NFL's uniform number policy, the chart should be changed accordingly. Otherwise, I think it should be left as is. EmJaySena ( talk) 17:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Gerry Callahan Sports Illustrated (December 11, 1995) " All-purpose Weapon; Steeler Kordell (Slash) Stewart, a passer/runner/receiver, is disarming Pittsburgh's foes"
Maybe 10 is a valid WR number nowadays, but if it wasn't allowed in 1995 then the rule doesn't date from 1973 as the article suggests. jnestorius( talk) 23:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Reception (American football) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 07:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are Dallas and Oakland grouped together and Pittsburgh and Washington each treated separately? Either Dallas and Oakland should be separated out into their own subsections, or all of the teams that don't retire jerseys should be in one section without being subdivided. gohlkus ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm looking for proof on this but I'm fairly sure that the chart is wrong where it lists DL and LB as "Yes" for numbers 30-39 and 40-49. These numbers, as far as I am aware, are only usable by TE/RB/DB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.216.200.145 ( talk) 20:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
The chart was made based on the information that was there before it. If there's some sort of reliable source of information regarding the NFL's uniform number policy, the chart should be changed accordingly. Otherwise, I think it should be left as is. EmJaySena ( talk) 17:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Gerry Callahan Sports Illustrated (December 11, 1995) " All-purpose Weapon; Steeler Kordell (Slash) Stewart, a passer/runner/receiver, is disarming Pittsburgh's foes"
Maybe 10 is a valid WR number nowadays, but if it wasn't allowed in 1995 then the rule doesn't date from 1973 as the article suggests. jnestorius( talk) 23:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Reception (American football) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 07:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)