This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The diagram confused me at first: it made me think that a URI consisted of a URN directly followed by ( concatenated with) a URL. Perhaps something less rectangular would be better—a Venn diagram, for instance. Cup o’ Java ( talk • edits) 18:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The article not explain the equivalence or distinction (or contexts for it) between URL and URN.
... And, most importante, just a "contradition feeling" while reading the article today:
So, suggest to express what is a concrete reality for URNs in the first sections, a any other encyclopedic description of an Internet Standard, and the opinions in other section as "criticism" or "implementation experiences", etc. -- Krauss ( talk) 10:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The syntax diagram added to the section Syntax was generated by the Railroad Diagram Generator using the following code:
namestring ::= 'urn' ':' NID ':' NSS (('?+' r-component)? ('?=' q-component)?)? ('#' fragment)?
based on the code in the box above it.
-- Ennex2 ( talk) 10:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Readers of this page may be interested in thw following discussion:
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The diagram confused me at first: it made me think that a URI consisted of a URN directly followed by ( concatenated with) a URL. Perhaps something less rectangular would be better—a Venn diagram, for instance. Cup o’ Java ( talk • edits) 18:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The article not explain the equivalence or distinction (or contexts for it) between URL and URN.
... And, most importante, just a "contradition feeling" while reading the article today:
So, suggest to express what is a concrete reality for URNs in the first sections, a any other encyclopedic description of an Internet Standard, and the opinions in other section as "criticism" or "implementation experiences", etc. -- Krauss ( talk) 10:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The syntax diagram added to the section Syntax was generated by the Railroad Diagram Generator using the following code:
namestring ::= 'urn' ':' NID ':' NSS (('?+' r-component)? ('?=' q-component)?)? ('#' fragment)?
based on the code in the box above it.
-- Ennex2 ( talk) 10:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Readers of this page may be interested in thw following discussion: