![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems Unicode Inc is the official name - based on some posting found in unicode@unicode.org forum. This is a private company registered in California. Mark Davis, a Google Executive has been the president of this private company, from day-one it was formed to date. The company has registered "Unicode" as its Trademark. It is not registered as any Consortium. It is also not registered as International Institute.
This may be discussed so that information be corrected as applicable.
Kurmaa ( talk) 19:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
One can write what s(he) likes, but it is good idea to check before using their webpage as the reference prior to advertise. The bottom of this is what is Unicode, Inc and it is the owner of that page. Since it is a private company, its president is the same person from day one - does not happen in any international Institute. Though we know some governments have same presidents until they were forced out or killed such as Taliban President of Afghanistan who was forced out. The President of Iraq who was executed. It does not look like Unicode Inc qualifies to international Institute or Consortium. This is private Company. Kurmaa ( talk) 19:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
From Internet Explorer 11 there's "This page can’t be displayed" for Unicode Consortium which is 404? Lmstearn ( talk) 06:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey! It looks like this section lacks some neutrality, although I haven't edited Wikipedia in a while, so I don't have a current grasp of the neutrality policy:
The UTC accepts documents from any organization or individual, whether they are members of the Unicode Consortium or not. [1] [2] The UTC holds its meetings behind closed doors, and its voting members are overwhelmingly white, American, and male. [3] As of July 2020, the UTC rules on both emoji and script proposals at the same meeting.
This is a super important criticism to bring up, but it's pretty jarring in context with the article, surrounded by very neutral statements.
Jamesjpk ( talk) 21:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems Unicode Inc is the official name - based on some posting found in unicode@unicode.org forum. This is a private company registered in California. Mark Davis, a Google Executive has been the president of this private company, from day-one it was formed to date. The company has registered "Unicode" as its Trademark. It is not registered as any Consortium. It is also not registered as International Institute.
This may be discussed so that information be corrected as applicable.
Kurmaa ( talk) 19:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
One can write what s(he) likes, but it is good idea to check before using their webpage as the reference prior to advertise. The bottom of this is what is Unicode, Inc and it is the owner of that page. Since it is a private company, its president is the same person from day one - does not happen in any international Institute. Though we know some governments have same presidents until they were forced out or killed such as Taliban President of Afghanistan who was forced out. The President of Iraq who was executed. It does not look like Unicode Inc qualifies to international Institute or Consortium. This is private Company. Kurmaa ( talk) 19:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
From Internet Explorer 11 there's "This page can’t be displayed" for Unicode Consortium which is 404? Lmstearn ( talk) 06:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey! It looks like this section lacks some neutrality, although I haven't edited Wikipedia in a while, so I don't have a current grasp of the neutrality policy:
The UTC accepts documents from any organization or individual, whether they are members of the Unicode Consortium or not. [1] [2] The UTC holds its meetings behind closed doors, and its voting members are overwhelmingly white, American, and male. [3] As of July 2020, the UTC rules on both emoji and script proposals at the same meeting.
This is a super important criticism to bring up, but it's pretty jarring in context with the article, surrounded by very neutral statements.
Jamesjpk ( talk) 21:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)