![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article has no reliable, secondary sources and puts forth no claim for why the Cafe is of any actual note. The principle emphasis of the article seems to be that the "Fort Hood Chapter" of the IVAW meet there but the Killeen IVAW itself don't even meet the notability threshold. I understand that the Under the Hood might play an important role in the lives of the people immediately involved in it but that does not qualify it for inclusion in wikipedia under wikipedia's notability guideline. If this is not addressed by another editor in the next couple of days I will begin the deletion process by proposing a deletion. TomPointTwo ( talk) 19:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The article is now fairly well referenced. Since this discussion hasn't developed since 2009 I am removing the tag. -- Duncan ( talk) 13:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
-- Jmbranum ( talk) 19:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I am reinstating the deleted citation to The Socialist Worker article. Another editor said it was not a reliable source. I disagree. And I'm also reinstating the Univision article ( http://www.univision.com/content/videoplayer.jhtml?cid=1885664 ) The fact that the story is in Spanish does not negate it being a source. -- Jmbranum ( talk) 19:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Under the Hood Café. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article has no reliable, secondary sources and puts forth no claim for why the Cafe is of any actual note. The principle emphasis of the article seems to be that the "Fort Hood Chapter" of the IVAW meet there but the Killeen IVAW itself don't even meet the notability threshold. I understand that the Under the Hood might play an important role in the lives of the people immediately involved in it but that does not qualify it for inclusion in wikipedia under wikipedia's notability guideline. If this is not addressed by another editor in the next couple of days I will begin the deletion process by proposing a deletion. TomPointTwo ( talk) 19:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The article is now fairly well referenced. Since this discussion hasn't developed since 2009 I am removing the tag. -- Duncan ( talk) 13:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
-- Jmbranum ( talk) 19:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I am reinstating the deleted citation to The Socialist Worker article. Another editor said it was not a reliable source. I disagree. And I'm also reinstating the Univision article ( http://www.univision.com/content/videoplayer.jhtml?cid=1885664 ) The fact that the story is in Spanish does not negate it being a source. -- Jmbranum ( talk) 19:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Under the Hood Café. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)