This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:  • Extended periodic table Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:  • Talk:Extended periodic table

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Extended periodic table.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2005. The result of the discussion was redirect to systematic element name.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elements Low‑importance This redirect is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this redirect, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I thought that was element 143. Remember the g block? 65.80.178.227 ( talk) 23:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC) reply

According to the infobox, there was a deletion request back in 2005 resulting in a decision to redirect to Systematic Element Name. Well, ok, no objection to the decision here, but it's nearly five years later and the article is still around-- no redirect. Did I miss a change of consensus or something? 209.236.250.213 ( talk) 01:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I think unbipentium should be put back. I successfully replaced it. Check it out! -94.36.20.252