This   level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a physics diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

I just wanted to put in my two cents. Kukini

Thanks! I'm not quite sure how to say stuff on this talk page. Is this the right way? Abhineet u 06:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC) reply

This article should be expanded and renamed to Fluorescence Lifetime techniques or Luminescence Lifetime Techniques (a more technically correct word as fluorescence implies nanoseconds and shorter) with a comparison of the various techniques. Others popular ones are Stroboscopic, gated voltage-controlled integrator, and phase. Stroboscopic and gated VCI are time domain techniques (ns and us respectivley) where phase is not. I think this would benefit everyone. Transient absorption is an article by it's self. Feel free to contact me directly via my profile I can help get you the info for the others. untionic —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.216.130.46 ( talk) 16:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The link for the controling and probing PHD thesis at the bottom of the article is no longer a valid link. DWF

In the section about TCSP there is an incomplete sentence; This method is used to analyze the relaxation of molecules and from an excited state to a lower energy state. The AND after the word molecules should probably not be there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.189.152.142 ( talk) 18:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC) reply