![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I understand if the vehicle entering the ULEZ has a ‘disabled’ or ‘disabled passenger vehicle’ tax class they will be exempt. There are other exemptions listed in the link below.
Perhaps a section on those vehicles which are exempt from the charge should go under the charges section?
https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ultra-low-emission-zone/discounts-and-exemptions#on-this-page-1
10:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)10:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robata ( talk • contribs)
1) What is the significance of the difference between:
vehicles pre-[year]
and pre-[year] vehicles
If none, can the difference be removed?
2) Taking this as an example: "Petrol cars and vans that do not meet Euro 4 standards (vehicles pre-2006)"
The meaning of 'vehicles pre-2006' is not clear in the context. Are we to take it that no pre-2006 vehicles meet the Euro 4 standards? Or that the Euro 4 standards only apply to pre-2006 vehicles, or what?
Can this please be reworded unambiguously?
Please would someone add a link to an official map of the Ultra Low Emission Zone area ? Darkman101 ( talk) 22:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
A better title would be "London Ultra Low Emission Zone". As with "London low emission zone". S C Cheese ( talk) 16:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
As a layman, I would read "emissions" to mean either carbon dioxide or *all* emissions unless specified otherwise.
It's unclear here whether the emissions being referred to are carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, something else, or a combination.
This is important, because it defines what the benefit of the ULEZ is. EditorPerson53 ( talk) 07:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
The first appearance of Tfl in the article is not explained. What is Tfl? GBC ( talk) 23:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
How is "ULEZ" pronounced? -- 95.24.69.191 ( talk) 09:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
The introduction statement "The zone has been shown to reduce the number of polluting cars on the road and reduced roadside emissions" is as summary of the body text. The Imperial study says air pollution has been reduced, but by less than TfL show. That is reflected in the body text. MRSC ( talk) 09:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
SVG file File:UK traffic sign TA5054.F.svg (pictured right) is ready for use when the expanded zone comes into effect on Tuesday. -- Minoa ( talk) 08:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
This section needs better sources or rewriting. TalkTV, LBC and the Daily Mail are not reliable sources. MRSC ( talk) 11:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
This comes from the Guardian article https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/28/london-ulez-averts-more-air-pollution-than-that-caused-by-capitals-airports-report-shows. The title of this article is sensationalised and should by itself not be used. Reading further into the article we can see this comparison only holds for Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) emissions.
For PM2.5 this comparison does not hold. Furthermore, there is no mention of CO2 in this article at all, which is the main pollutant (by mass) in both cars and airplanes. Jacque6306 ( talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I understand if the vehicle entering the ULEZ has a ‘disabled’ or ‘disabled passenger vehicle’ tax class they will be exempt. There are other exemptions listed in the link below.
Perhaps a section on those vehicles which are exempt from the charge should go under the charges section?
https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ultra-low-emission-zone/discounts-and-exemptions#on-this-page-1
10:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)10:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robata ( talk • contribs)
1) What is the significance of the difference between:
vehicles pre-[year]
and pre-[year] vehicles
If none, can the difference be removed?
2) Taking this as an example: "Petrol cars and vans that do not meet Euro 4 standards (vehicles pre-2006)"
The meaning of 'vehicles pre-2006' is not clear in the context. Are we to take it that no pre-2006 vehicles meet the Euro 4 standards? Or that the Euro 4 standards only apply to pre-2006 vehicles, or what?
Can this please be reworded unambiguously?
Please would someone add a link to an official map of the Ultra Low Emission Zone area ? Darkman101 ( talk) 22:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
A better title would be "London Ultra Low Emission Zone". As with "London low emission zone". S C Cheese ( talk) 16:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
As a layman, I would read "emissions" to mean either carbon dioxide or *all* emissions unless specified otherwise.
It's unclear here whether the emissions being referred to are carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, something else, or a combination.
This is important, because it defines what the benefit of the ULEZ is. EditorPerson53 ( talk) 07:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
The first appearance of Tfl in the article is not explained. What is Tfl? GBC ( talk) 23:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
How is "ULEZ" pronounced? -- 95.24.69.191 ( talk) 09:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
The introduction statement "The zone has been shown to reduce the number of polluting cars on the road and reduced roadside emissions" is as summary of the body text. The Imperial study says air pollution has been reduced, but by less than TfL show. That is reflected in the body text. MRSC ( talk) 09:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
SVG file File:UK traffic sign TA5054.F.svg (pictured right) is ready for use when the expanded zone comes into effect on Tuesday. -- Minoa ( talk) 08:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
This section needs better sources or rewriting. TalkTV, LBC and the Daily Mail are not reliable sources. MRSC ( talk) 11:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
This comes from the Guardian article https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/28/london-ulez-averts-more-air-pollution-than-that-caused-by-capitals-airports-report-shows. The title of this article is sensationalised and should by itself not be used. Reading further into the article we can see this comparison only holds for Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) emissions.
For PM2.5 this comparison does not hold. Furthermore, there is no mention of CO2 in this article at all, which is the main pollutant (by mass) in both cars and airplanes. Jacque6306 ( talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)