![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions:
I don't know why is someone writing about "opposition fron ICOMOS", there was no opposition, although there was opposition from the english representant. I have all the interventions, but in spanish.
Guervos 09:12, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
I have read the ICOMOS evaluation, and says nothing about opposition. You can read : Recommendation with respect to inscription That the property be deferred subject to redefinition a verification of the nominated areas and buffer zones.
This is not exactly opposition, is only a recomendation to delay the inscription.
Guervos 22:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
From my talk page:
-- Philip Baird Shearer 16:44, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Without rehashing old arguments there is little more for me to say that I have not already said previously,(and is now archived), other than to say that:
It's incorrect to call it the "vandalized" version, since it isn't simple vandalism, although it is legitimate to call this person a vandal, since he's using sockpuppets in a very abusive manner to support one side in an editing dispute. This puts other people who happen to support that particular side in a very uncomfortable position and poisons the whole debate. -- Curps 20:34, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Úbeda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions:
I don't know why is someone writing about "opposition fron ICOMOS", there was no opposition, although there was opposition from the english representant. I have all the interventions, but in spanish.
Guervos 09:12, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
I have read the ICOMOS evaluation, and says nothing about opposition. You can read : Recommendation with respect to inscription That the property be deferred subject to redefinition a verification of the nominated areas and buffer zones.
This is not exactly opposition, is only a recomendation to delay the inscription.
Guervos 22:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
From my talk page:
-- Philip Baird Shearer 16:44, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Without rehashing old arguments there is little more for me to say that I have not already said previously,(and is now archived), other than to say that:
It's incorrect to call it the "vandalized" version, since it isn't simple vandalism, although it is legitimate to call this person a vandal, since he's using sockpuppets in a very abusive manner to support one side in an editing dispute. This puts other people who happen to support that particular side in a very uncomfortable position and poisons the whole debate. -- Curps 20:34, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Úbeda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)