A fact from US Railcar appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December 2010 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that despite being a builder of railroad rolling stock, US Railcar has no facilities with which to construct their products? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

See: Wikipedia:Merge#Proposing_a_merger

I propose that Colorado Railcar be merged into US Railcar now that they are one in the same. Bubblecuffer ( talk) 19:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

• Support - <insert reason for supporting merger here> Bubblecuffer ( talk) 20:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

• Oppose - <insert reason for opposing merger here> Bubblecuffer ( talk) 20:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

I disagree; it's a separate entity - separate location, players, and history. Sorry, I think merging would be a waste of time. Doug Grinbergs ( talk) 03:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC) reply