This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / North America / South America / United States / World War II / Cold War C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force South American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

I reverted the additions regarding a supposed suppression of info by the Navy and the possibility of an old WWII sub just off the California coast. sfgate article While I must admit it was an interesting read, there is no proof, or documentation that this happened. And while I would like to take one former sailor's word for it, I can't. WP really needs to have verifible sources. So should someone ever find the supposed sub in question, I'd be more than happy to add this back to the article, however until then, I don't think this is quite appropriate. -- Malo 08:02, 7 November 2005 (UTC) reply