GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Moswento ( talk · contribs) 11:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Overall, a very good article. I have a few queries on the text, below, but the article covers all the main aspects of the ship's design and service history, without any obvious gaps. There's no evidence of OR or plagiarism, and the references all look like reliable sources. The picture's good. Almost ready to pass this. Moswento talky 14:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
All fixed. Thanks for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Moswento ( talk · contribs) 11:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Overall, a very good article. I have a few queries on the text, below, but the article covers all the main aspects of the ship's design and service history, without any obvious gaps. There's no evidence of OR or plagiarism, and the references all look like reliable sources. The picture's good. Almost ready to pass this. Moswento talky 14:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
All fixed. Thanks for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)