This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
USS Oklahoma (SSN-802) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I’m not sure why everyone keeps changing the description and specifications as if it has a Virginia payload module. It does not. Even the description of the block five submarines on Wikipedia says that the Virginia payload model starts with the second block five submarine. You keep reverting the edits as if the Oklahoma will be built or is being built with a Virginia payload module with all the larger specifications that come with that. It is the size and shape of a block for because it does not include the Virginia payload module! Galt2112 ( talk) 06:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Only one source states that the first of the Block V boats, Oklahoma, is the boat that will not include a VPM. I wonder if this is what has you pushing to change Oklahoma to Block IV? Anyway, AFAIC, we should leave things as is... for now, with Oklahoma as a Block V, VPM boat. Until we have more sourcing providing a clearer picture. "As is" is also what the majority of reliable sourcing is telling is right now. (see: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] & [12]) I'll check back in a little while to see what sources are reporting at that point, and if there is enough to justify a change, then we'll make that happen. But then, just like now, we can't change anything based on a single source when we have multiple sources all saying our current info is correct. - wolf 11:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
USS Oklahoma (SSN-802) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I’m not sure why everyone keeps changing the description and specifications as if it has a Virginia payload module. It does not. Even the description of the block five submarines on Wikipedia says that the Virginia payload model starts with the second block five submarine. You keep reverting the edits as if the Oklahoma will be built or is being built with a Virginia payload module with all the larger specifications that come with that. It is the size and shape of a block for because it does not include the Virginia payload module! Galt2112 ( talk) 06:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Only one source states that the first of the Block V boats, Oklahoma, is the boat that will not include a VPM. I wonder if this is what has you pushing to change Oklahoma to Block IV? Anyway, AFAIC, we should leave things as is... for now, with Oklahoma as a Block V, VPM boat. Until we have more sourcing providing a clearer picture. "As is" is also what the majority of reliable sourcing is telling is right now. (see: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] & [12]) I'll check back in a little while to see what sources are reporting at that point, and if there is enough to justify a change, then we'll make that happen. But then, just like now, we can't change anything based on a single source when we have multiple sources all saying our current info is correct. - wolf 11:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)