![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on UN M.49. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Doug Ewell ( talk) 20:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC) (Co-Designated Expert for BCP 47)
Why does the “UN M.49” have Bouvet Island as part of South America, when in fact it is closer to the mainland of Africa within its distance? Craig Lungren ( talk) 17:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
After learning the first 21 3-digit codes, which are …
001: World / 002: Africa / 003: North America / 004: Afghanistan /
005: South America / 006: Asia / 007: Europe / 008: Albania /
009: Oceania / 010: Antarctica / 011: Western Africa / 012: Algeria /
013: Central America / 014: Eastern Africa / 015: Northern Africa /
016: American Samoa / 017: Middle Africa / 018: Southern Africa /
019: America / 020: Andorra / 021: Northern America
… I’m wondering: why should other 3-digit codes for the UN M49, such as “022”, “023”, “025”, etc., be missing?
I have even found out that some codes are no longer in use, which includes …
- Asia that was originally 006, but is now “142”
- Europe that was originally 007, but is now “150”
- Southern Asia that was originally 033, but is now “062”
- Western Asia that was originally 037, but is now “145”
- Western Europe that was originally 038, but is now “155”
- Eastern Europe that was originally 041, but is now “151”
- Northern Europe that was originally 042, but is now “154”
- Australia & New Zealand originally 043, but is now “053”
- Melanesia that was originally 045, but is now “054”
- Micronesia-Polynesia that was 046, but is now “055”
- Micronesia that was 047, but is now “057”
- Polynesia that was originally 049, but is now “061”
- Central Asia that was originally 143, but is now “062”
… and yet I think: Why did those divisions need to change from their original UN M49 code to a new 3-digit code? Why couldn’t Asia remain with 006, and so forth?
I don’t think any 3-digit code should be missing and should all remain in use today! Craig Lungren ( talk) 17:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on UN M.49. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Doug Ewell ( talk) 20:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC) (Co-Designated Expert for BCP 47)
Why does the “UN M.49” have Bouvet Island as part of South America, when in fact it is closer to the mainland of Africa within its distance? Craig Lungren ( talk) 17:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
After learning the first 21 3-digit codes, which are …
001: World / 002: Africa / 003: North America / 004: Afghanistan /
005: South America / 006: Asia / 007: Europe / 008: Albania /
009: Oceania / 010: Antarctica / 011: Western Africa / 012: Algeria /
013: Central America / 014: Eastern Africa / 015: Northern Africa /
016: American Samoa / 017: Middle Africa / 018: Southern Africa /
019: America / 020: Andorra / 021: Northern America
… I’m wondering: why should other 3-digit codes for the UN M49, such as “022”, “023”, “025”, etc., be missing?
I have even found out that some codes are no longer in use, which includes …
- Asia that was originally 006, but is now “142”
- Europe that was originally 007, but is now “150”
- Southern Asia that was originally 033, but is now “062”
- Western Asia that was originally 037, but is now “145”
- Western Europe that was originally 038, but is now “155”
- Eastern Europe that was originally 041, but is now “151”
- Northern Europe that was originally 042, but is now “154”
- Australia & New Zealand originally 043, but is now “053”
- Melanesia that was originally 045, but is now “054”
- Micronesia-Polynesia that was 046, but is now “055”
- Micronesia that was 047, but is now “057”
- Polynesia that was originally 049, but is now “061”
- Central Asia that was originally 143, but is now “062”
… and yet I think: Why did those divisions need to change from their original UN M49 code to a new 3-digit code? Why couldn’t Asia remain with 006, and so forth?
I don’t think any 3-digit code should be missing and should all remain in use today! Craig Lungren ( talk) 17:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)