This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Sorry to be anal, but if Turkey aren't a "European" nation, surely Russia should also be added to this parenthasis seeing as only a part of each of these nations lies in Europe. Comments? - 81.100.216.53 01:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Why oh why did UEFA decide to punish Rangers FC when the "problems" are political surely to goodness the fine should be for the British/Scottish government as since time immemorial the indigenous population of Scotland has been let down. I urge all Rangers fans to e mail their MEP and the european parliament to fine the UK government because of generations of inaction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.255.178 ( talk • contribs) 12:36, 27 May 2006
I would also question why the UEFA should pretend to be tough on British MP's, given FIFA last visited Russia. FIFA showed a map of Russia with the Crimea. Half a year before, FIFA was supposed to "investigate" claims about political stunts made by the Argentines. If the Argentines dare to pull of a similar stunt again, then the Argies are tougher than the rest (who respect FIFA or UEFAs authority).-- Stat-ist-ikk ( talk) 10:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Why in the nations qualified to the world cup appears Serbia and not Montenegro if Serbia hasn't gone to the world cup by itself 66.119.81.178 01:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
As long as Wikipedia supposed to support neutrality, it is wrong to count all the USSR statistics to Russia. It would be terribly unjust in respect to other Soviet republics, and first of all UKRAINE !!! Morkva 06:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Why is it that it is constantly being changed...TURKEY IS IN ASIA..accept it whoever you are... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.227.95 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 4 October 2006
Europe is bounded to the north by the Arctic Ocean, to the west by the Atlantic Ocean, to the south by the Mediterranean Sea, and – according to the traditional geographic definition – to the south-east by the waterways adjoining the Mediterranean to and including the Black Sea and the Caucasus Mountains (in Caucasia). Europe's eastern frontier is vague, but has traditionally been given as the divide of the Ural Mountains and the Caspian Sea to the south-east. The Urals are considered by most to be a geographical and tectonic landmark separating Asia from Europe
Lets settle this, Turkey had the choice to join UEFA or the AFC, they chose UEFA so it was up to the Turkish FA Chaza93 08:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
NOTE: FIFA considers Germany to carry West Germany's record. The same goes for Serbia, Serbia and Montenegro and Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (not Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia - SFRY); Czech Republic and Czechoslovakia; and Russia and the USSR. For purposes of these articles the latter three have been separated because they represent different peoples and areas.
The last sentence is not true and contradicts whats displayed in the section. Does any have any sources that confirm the continuity of FAs/world cup records as I think all of the team articles can be improved as well. // Laughing Man 23:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. - GTBacchus( talk) 00:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
UEFA → Union of European Football Associations — Parity with other continental governing bodies, which live at their official, expanded titles; page intro already leads with expanded title. DeLarge 16:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Like many other international sporting bodies, isn't the acronym a shortened form of a French name? If it is, that would make the proposed title a backronym. Chris cheese whine 22:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Can we shrink these at all? I'm seeing about 3 screenfuls. Either that, or use the show/hide mechanism, perhaps. Chris cheese whine 22:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Would a link on the UEFA page be relevant, given that Gaillard would be the figure that is most commonly seen and heard from, obviously along with Michel Platini. Londo06 17:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
You-ee-fah? Some people pronounce UEFA that way Londo06 17:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Does anybody know what this is, to write an article about it? It is referenced at Stadium:mk, the new stadium in Milton Keynes (and on its own website). -- Concrete Cowboy 12:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
"Of the 32 available spots in the 2006 FIFA World Cup, 14 were allocated to UEFA national teams, and currently 15 of the top 20 teams in the FIFA World Rankings are UEFA members."
If there are 14 UEFA teams, how can there be 15 top teams from UEFA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.243.152.138 ( talk • contribs) 02:45, 17 November 2007
I am going to be bold and remove these, half the numbers are missing. Whilst FIFA supplies UEFA rankings. These are on the FIFA page, and aren't really needed here. F 9 T 16:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Is it me or is the opening sentence of this article non-sense? It reads "The Union des associations européennes de football, or Union of European Football Associations in English". The article is about the UEFA not about the UAEF. Am I missing something? Acronyms are, well, acronyms! So can we correct the opening anglophobic reversal of reality please? LookingGlass ( talk) 20:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
'== Club Competitions =='Bold text
The article says this: "Only three teams [1] (Juventus FC, AFC Ajax and FC Bayern Munich) have won each of the three competitions [1], a feat that is no longer possible for any team that did not win the Cup Winners' Cup. There are currently ten teams throughout Europe that have won two of the three trophies; all have won the Cup Winners Cup, six require a win in the Champions League and four require a UEFA Cup win."
Either I'm not reading it as it's meant to be read, or there is an error. Liverpool FC has won both the Champions League and the UEFA Cup, but not the Cup Winners Cup. i.e. they have won two of the three trophies, but have not won the Cup Winners Cup. -- Ftumch ( talk) 01:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I would like to raise attention to the fact that Israel is not in Europe. It is in the Middle East, which is part of Asia. They should not be members of UEFA, nor should they consider themselves part of Europe (for the basis of performing in the Eurovision Song Contest). Can anyone explain to me why they are part of UEFA? I know that this talk page won't lead to them being kicked out, but I would like it if someone could explain it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.45.93 ( talk) 22:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for the answer.
Why the results of Yugoslavia are only computed for Serbia? -- 190.172.253.124 ( talk) 03:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
If Czech Republic carries Czechoslovakia's record, the same should be done for Slovakia. Indeed, FIFA does it as can be noted on its website: http://www.fifa.com/associations/association=svk/index.html
Reference n.4 is a broken link. WTer ( talk) 00:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Why the dooooche is Argentina in the "UEFA clubs in the WC" and down as never having won it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.64.245 ( talk) 18:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Surely the English translation of l'Union Européenne de Football Association is "European Union of Association Football"? The article uses "Union of European Football Associations". Can we have a citation for this? Mooretwin ( talk) 13:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
“ | Several national football associations which are geographically in Asia belong to UEFA rather than the Asian Football Confederation (AFC). These nations are Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Israel, Cyprus (Israel and Kazakhstan are former AFC members). Cyprus chose to be classed as a European football nation – it had the choice of Europe, Asia or Africa. | ” |
First of all, what is up with sentence involving exclusively Cyprus? Why does it not have any supporting documents in that regard? Second of all, if you list so many nations why were the Russian Federation and Turkey omitted? That makes like no sense at all. Aren't those countries in Asia either? Kazakhstan apparently marginally in Europe by geographic definition, so are Georgia and Azerbaijan as some of they territories lay at the northern foothills of the Caucasian mountains. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 03:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
My proposition is instead of pointlessly list countries, portraying ones unmeasurable knowledge in geography, simply state that "Several national football associations countries of which are located on the border between Asia and Europe such as Kazakhstan, Cyprus, and others have chosen to join the European football community. The latest addition of the UEFA, Kazakhstan, joined the Union in 2002 (or whenever) by surrendering their Asian membership on the grounds of participating in the Soviet Top League or whatever." Of course, it does not have to be exactly that way, but this way it is less confusing. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 03:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
England, Wales, Scoland and the Irish FA (Northern Ireland) are also not sovereign states. They are constituent parts of the UK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.179.8 ( talk) 10:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian ( talk) 13:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
UEFA → Union of European Football Associations – Per the move of ASEAN. It should not be acronym. Il223334234 ( talk) 11:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Uefa logo since 2007.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Uefa logo since 2007.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC) |
Sometime's Wikipedia's bots just make Wikipedia look ridiculous. Can anyone think of a valid reason to have "citation needed" after the team names in the World Cup participation (Mens) table? There doesn't seem to be anything in that column that could be cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6030:44:1B6:90A5:EC7A:E5A6 ( talk) 22:44, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
<ref name="Yugoslavia" />
. Those were links to footnotes explaining the situation when a country has become independent, or when their football team has been succeeded by that of another country. But this article didn't have a <ref>
tag named "Yugoslavia". So there were errors in the footnote section. To get rid of the errors, someone replaced all of those named tags with {{
citation needed}}. To get rid of those, I added footnotes for teams with successor teams. For the newly independent teams, I just deleted the {{
citation needed}} tags, because that seems self explanatory. --
Margin1522 (
talk)
01:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)This article has a lot of good information about UEFA members, but not so much about the organization itself. I think it could be improved by describing the history of its founding, the relationship with FIFA, its role in organizing European championships, relationship with clubs (often seen as a spokesman for the clubs vs. FIFA), and its role in controlling advertising revenues, etc. There are good sources about UEFA and the business of football on Google Books. A history of football in Europe should have a lot of information about UEFA. -- Margin1522 ( talk) 14:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
concacaf has a list of all current title holders of all the concacaf competitions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CONCACAF#Current_Champions maybe that could be added, including the champions league, europa league, euro, u21/u19/u17 euro, women's competitions, ... 92.196.116.44 ( talk) 10:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
From uefa site http://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/association=SRB/index.html
Founded: 1919 UEFA affiliation: 1954 FIFA affiliation: 1921
data from this site:
Founded: 1948 UEFA affiliation: 2006 FIFA affiliation: 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.65.105 ( talk) 12:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Several "European" players have voiced concern about the rights of foreign players in China being usurped by young Chinese players, as new rules were adopted in China over the newyears holiday. Press monitors should be aware of this current situation and representations.
Due to a disproportionately high number of foreigners playing football in China, and a lack of "youthful" Chinese players, new rules were established over the '17/'18 newyear to require an equal or greater number of Chinese youngsters to foreigners on the pitch during gameplay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.189.18 ( talk) 18:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to see some reference to the UEFA regions [1] (Northern, Central-East and Southern-Meditteranian). Maybe not an exhaustive list, but at least a paragraph. Hmloyal ( talk) 19:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47474106
Please add BBC 2019 polls with 500 thousands respodents that stated Ronaldo as the best foreign midfielder in Premier League all time.
In Real Madrid website clearly stated Ronaldo won 3 UEFA Super Cups with Madrid. Why Wiki only wrote Ronaldo won 2 ?? I think its 2016 Cup missing from Ronaldo honours. If you think Ronaldo didnt deserved that because he didnt played in the final. But let me inform you FIFA rule all the players who include the squad member deserve that club honour though they didnt play in final. If you do that for Ronaldo you must do that to all player dont make double standard. Ex : Ronaldo Brazil didnt played a single match in 1994 World Cup but Wiki wrote Ronaldo Brazil won 1994 World Cup. Roy Keane and Paul Scholes didnt played in Champions League 1999 Final but Wiki wrote they won it. Lionel Messi didnt played in Champions League 2006 final and Supercoppa Espana 2005 final but Wiki wrote Messi won both cups. Gareth Bale also didnt played in UEFA Super Cups 2016 final but Wiki wrote Gareth Bale won the cup. Please be fair otherwise wiki will judge undermining Ronaldo accomplishment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.119.66.58 ( talk) 04:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Members
The danish member Jesper Møller is linked wrong and is not the right page. The current link is going towards the danish animator /info/en/?search=Jesper_M%C3%B8ller
The correct link would be /info/en/?search=Jesper_M%C3%B8ller_(DBU) He is the person in charge of the Danish Football Association (DBU) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.58.44.183 ( talk) 11:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Sorry to be anal, but if Turkey aren't a "European" nation, surely Russia should also be added to this parenthasis seeing as only a part of each of these nations lies in Europe. Comments? - 81.100.216.53 01:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Why oh why did UEFA decide to punish Rangers FC when the "problems" are political surely to goodness the fine should be for the British/Scottish government as since time immemorial the indigenous population of Scotland has been let down. I urge all Rangers fans to e mail their MEP and the european parliament to fine the UK government because of generations of inaction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.255.178 ( talk • contribs) 12:36, 27 May 2006
I would also question why the UEFA should pretend to be tough on British MP's, given FIFA last visited Russia. FIFA showed a map of Russia with the Crimea. Half a year before, FIFA was supposed to "investigate" claims about political stunts made by the Argentines. If the Argentines dare to pull of a similar stunt again, then the Argies are tougher than the rest (who respect FIFA or UEFAs authority).-- Stat-ist-ikk ( talk) 10:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Why in the nations qualified to the world cup appears Serbia and not Montenegro if Serbia hasn't gone to the world cup by itself 66.119.81.178 01:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
As long as Wikipedia supposed to support neutrality, it is wrong to count all the USSR statistics to Russia. It would be terribly unjust in respect to other Soviet republics, and first of all UKRAINE !!! Morkva 06:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Why is it that it is constantly being changed...TURKEY IS IN ASIA..accept it whoever you are... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.227.95 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 4 October 2006
Europe is bounded to the north by the Arctic Ocean, to the west by the Atlantic Ocean, to the south by the Mediterranean Sea, and – according to the traditional geographic definition – to the south-east by the waterways adjoining the Mediterranean to and including the Black Sea and the Caucasus Mountains (in Caucasia). Europe's eastern frontier is vague, but has traditionally been given as the divide of the Ural Mountains and the Caspian Sea to the south-east. The Urals are considered by most to be a geographical and tectonic landmark separating Asia from Europe
Lets settle this, Turkey had the choice to join UEFA or the AFC, they chose UEFA so it was up to the Turkish FA Chaza93 08:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
NOTE: FIFA considers Germany to carry West Germany's record. The same goes for Serbia, Serbia and Montenegro and Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (not Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia - SFRY); Czech Republic and Czechoslovakia; and Russia and the USSR. For purposes of these articles the latter three have been separated because they represent different peoples and areas.
The last sentence is not true and contradicts whats displayed in the section. Does any have any sources that confirm the continuity of FAs/world cup records as I think all of the team articles can be improved as well. // Laughing Man 23:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. - GTBacchus( talk) 00:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
UEFA → Union of European Football Associations — Parity with other continental governing bodies, which live at their official, expanded titles; page intro already leads with expanded title. DeLarge 16:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Like many other international sporting bodies, isn't the acronym a shortened form of a French name? If it is, that would make the proposed title a backronym. Chris cheese whine 22:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Can we shrink these at all? I'm seeing about 3 screenfuls. Either that, or use the show/hide mechanism, perhaps. Chris cheese whine 22:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Would a link on the UEFA page be relevant, given that Gaillard would be the figure that is most commonly seen and heard from, obviously along with Michel Platini. Londo06 17:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
You-ee-fah? Some people pronounce UEFA that way Londo06 17:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Does anybody know what this is, to write an article about it? It is referenced at Stadium:mk, the new stadium in Milton Keynes (and on its own website). -- Concrete Cowboy 12:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
"Of the 32 available spots in the 2006 FIFA World Cup, 14 were allocated to UEFA national teams, and currently 15 of the top 20 teams in the FIFA World Rankings are UEFA members."
If there are 14 UEFA teams, how can there be 15 top teams from UEFA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.243.152.138 ( talk • contribs) 02:45, 17 November 2007
I am going to be bold and remove these, half the numbers are missing. Whilst FIFA supplies UEFA rankings. These are on the FIFA page, and aren't really needed here. F 9 T 16:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Is it me or is the opening sentence of this article non-sense? It reads "The Union des associations européennes de football, or Union of European Football Associations in English". The article is about the UEFA not about the UAEF. Am I missing something? Acronyms are, well, acronyms! So can we correct the opening anglophobic reversal of reality please? LookingGlass ( talk) 20:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
'== Club Competitions =='Bold text
The article says this: "Only three teams [1] (Juventus FC, AFC Ajax and FC Bayern Munich) have won each of the three competitions [1], a feat that is no longer possible for any team that did not win the Cup Winners' Cup. There are currently ten teams throughout Europe that have won two of the three trophies; all have won the Cup Winners Cup, six require a win in the Champions League and four require a UEFA Cup win."
Either I'm not reading it as it's meant to be read, or there is an error. Liverpool FC has won both the Champions League and the UEFA Cup, but not the Cup Winners Cup. i.e. they have won two of the three trophies, but have not won the Cup Winners Cup. -- Ftumch ( talk) 01:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I would like to raise attention to the fact that Israel is not in Europe. It is in the Middle East, which is part of Asia. They should not be members of UEFA, nor should they consider themselves part of Europe (for the basis of performing in the Eurovision Song Contest). Can anyone explain to me why they are part of UEFA? I know that this talk page won't lead to them being kicked out, but I would like it if someone could explain it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.45.93 ( talk) 22:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for the answer.
Why the results of Yugoslavia are only computed for Serbia? -- 190.172.253.124 ( talk) 03:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
If Czech Republic carries Czechoslovakia's record, the same should be done for Slovakia. Indeed, FIFA does it as can be noted on its website: http://www.fifa.com/associations/association=svk/index.html
Reference n.4 is a broken link. WTer ( talk) 00:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Why the dooooche is Argentina in the "UEFA clubs in the WC" and down as never having won it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.64.245 ( talk) 18:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Surely the English translation of l'Union Européenne de Football Association is "European Union of Association Football"? The article uses "Union of European Football Associations". Can we have a citation for this? Mooretwin ( talk) 13:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
“ | Several national football associations which are geographically in Asia belong to UEFA rather than the Asian Football Confederation (AFC). These nations are Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Israel, Cyprus (Israel and Kazakhstan are former AFC members). Cyprus chose to be classed as a European football nation – it had the choice of Europe, Asia or Africa. | ” |
First of all, what is up with sentence involving exclusively Cyprus? Why does it not have any supporting documents in that regard? Second of all, if you list so many nations why were the Russian Federation and Turkey omitted? That makes like no sense at all. Aren't those countries in Asia either? Kazakhstan apparently marginally in Europe by geographic definition, so are Georgia and Azerbaijan as some of they territories lay at the northern foothills of the Caucasian mountains. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 03:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
My proposition is instead of pointlessly list countries, portraying ones unmeasurable knowledge in geography, simply state that "Several national football associations countries of which are located on the border between Asia and Europe such as Kazakhstan, Cyprus, and others have chosen to join the European football community. The latest addition of the UEFA, Kazakhstan, joined the Union in 2002 (or whenever) by surrendering their Asian membership on the grounds of participating in the Soviet Top League or whatever." Of course, it does not have to be exactly that way, but this way it is less confusing. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 03:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
England, Wales, Scoland and the Irish FA (Northern Ireland) are also not sovereign states. They are constituent parts of the UK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.179.8 ( talk) 10:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian ( talk) 13:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
UEFA → Union of European Football Associations – Per the move of ASEAN. It should not be acronym. Il223334234 ( talk) 11:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Uefa logo since 2007.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Uefa logo since 2007.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC) |
Sometime's Wikipedia's bots just make Wikipedia look ridiculous. Can anyone think of a valid reason to have "citation needed" after the team names in the World Cup participation (Mens) table? There doesn't seem to be anything in that column that could be cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6030:44:1B6:90A5:EC7A:E5A6 ( talk) 22:44, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
<ref name="Yugoslavia" />
. Those were links to footnotes explaining the situation when a country has become independent, or when their football team has been succeeded by that of another country. But this article didn't have a <ref>
tag named "Yugoslavia". So there were errors in the footnote section. To get rid of the errors, someone replaced all of those named tags with {{
citation needed}}. To get rid of those, I added footnotes for teams with successor teams. For the newly independent teams, I just deleted the {{
citation needed}} tags, because that seems self explanatory. --
Margin1522 (
talk)
01:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)This article has a lot of good information about UEFA members, but not so much about the organization itself. I think it could be improved by describing the history of its founding, the relationship with FIFA, its role in organizing European championships, relationship with clubs (often seen as a spokesman for the clubs vs. FIFA), and its role in controlling advertising revenues, etc. There are good sources about UEFA and the business of football on Google Books. A history of football in Europe should have a lot of information about UEFA. -- Margin1522 ( talk) 14:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
concacaf has a list of all current title holders of all the concacaf competitions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CONCACAF#Current_Champions maybe that could be added, including the champions league, europa league, euro, u21/u19/u17 euro, women's competitions, ... 92.196.116.44 ( talk) 10:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
From uefa site http://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/association=SRB/index.html
Founded: 1919 UEFA affiliation: 1954 FIFA affiliation: 1921
data from this site:
Founded: 1948 UEFA affiliation: 2006 FIFA affiliation: 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.65.105 ( talk) 12:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Several "European" players have voiced concern about the rights of foreign players in China being usurped by young Chinese players, as new rules were adopted in China over the newyears holiday. Press monitors should be aware of this current situation and representations.
Due to a disproportionately high number of foreigners playing football in China, and a lack of "youthful" Chinese players, new rules were established over the '17/'18 newyear to require an equal or greater number of Chinese youngsters to foreigners on the pitch during gameplay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.189.18 ( talk) 18:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to see some reference to the UEFA regions [1] (Northern, Central-East and Southern-Meditteranian). Maybe not an exhaustive list, but at least a paragraph. Hmloyal ( talk) 19:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47474106
Please add BBC 2019 polls with 500 thousands respodents that stated Ronaldo as the best foreign midfielder in Premier League all time.
In Real Madrid website clearly stated Ronaldo won 3 UEFA Super Cups with Madrid. Why Wiki only wrote Ronaldo won 2 ?? I think its 2016 Cup missing from Ronaldo honours. If you think Ronaldo didnt deserved that because he didnt played in the final. But let me inform you FIFA rule all the players who include the squad member deserve that club honour though they didnt play in final. If you do that for Ronaldo you must do that to all player dont make double standard. Ex : Ronaldo Brazil didnt played a single match in 1994 World Cup but Wiki wrote Ronaldo Brazil won 1994 World Cup. Roy Keane and Paul Scholes didnt played in Champions League 1999 Final but Wiki wrote they won it. Lionel Messi didnt played in Champions League 2006 final and Supercoppa Espana 2005 final but Wiki wrote Messi won both cups. Gareth Bale also didnt played in UEFA Super Cups 2016 final but Wiki wrote Gareth Bale won the cup. Please be fair otherwise wiki will judge undermining Ronaldo accomplishment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.119.66.58 ( talk) 04:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Members
The danish member Jesper Møller is linked wrong and is not the right page. The current link is going towards the danish animator /info/en/?search=Jesper_M%C3%B8ller
The correct link would be /info/en/?search=Jesper_M%C3%B8ller_(DBU) He is the person in charge of the Danish Football Association (DBU) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.58.44.183 ( talk) 11:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)