This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
The graphics show US 264 reaching NC12 at Nags Head - whereas I think the eastern endpoint is actually in Manns Harbor in Mainland Dare at the 64/264 junction - Can someone fix this ? Ivan Warren 16:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
That is correct, US 264 ends at Manns Harbor; I will see if I can get somebody from the maps task force to help, but they are probably busy to help correct anytime soon. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
23:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I was just wondering what opinions are about splitting I-587. The small section it's in currently is definitely neglected and should be much bigger for a route close to completion. Also, a large section has been designated as an
Interstate, which I would believe enough criteria for it to be official.
DiscoA340 (
talk)
16:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Probably should be now,
as of today, signage for I-587 now appear on the freeway; well, they removed US 264 and slapped I-587 while leaving the old east-west markers on it, though I am sure it was supposed to be north-south. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Looking at the draft @
Ncchild it looks good, the only thing I would recommend is adding a "Future" section which talks about the eventual designation of the route, west of I-95. but all in all, it's good.
DiscoA340 (
talk)
01:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Two quick things. For one, I wrote the article expecting US 264 to be moved onto its alternate route from Farmville to Greenville, as was proposed by NCDOT and approved by AASHTO. NCDOT does seem to be replacing the US 264 signs with I-587 ones (instead of putting them next to each other) which seems to indicate this. However, is this significant enough to consider US 264 as moved onto its new route?
Secondly, I think, but am not positive that I-587 is using its own mile markers, which likely means it will use its own exits. But I don't have confirmation of either. Should I leave it as is right now?
Ncchild (
talk)
03:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I expect NCDOT is currently in the process of rerouting US 264 between north of Saratoga to Greenville, we already have the paperwork confirming this, and as part of I-587 designation, so we should go ahead and correct articles on this new alignment as well. The biggest trick now is breaking up US 264 Alt, which will be fragmented to two sections: Zebulon-Wilson and Greenville. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
13:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I do not think that is necessary, this should all be in the History section as I-587 replaces and continue to replace US 264 between Zebulon and Greenville. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
14:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Sorry for double commenting but I found this tool on the
Connect NCDOT website which may be of use. I've noticed that in both
Beaufort and
Pitt Counties plan, it shows them wanting a freeway grade route to continue on US 264 until Washington, NC. It might not mean anything related to I-587 though.
DiscoA340 (
talk)
14:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The map can be done, I can work on it later today. As for any sort of upgrades to Washington, I think that would be better suited for a future section of this article (US 264). I can begin working on cleaning up and upgrading 264 but it'll be after I finish
NC 97.
Ncchild (
talk)
14:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
The graphics show US 264 reaching NC12 at Nags Head - whereas I think the eastern endpoint is actually in Manns Harbor in Mainland Dare at the 64/264 junction - Can someone fix this ? Ivan Warren 16:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
That is correct, US 264 ends at Manns Harbor; I will see if I can get somebody from the maps task force to help, but they are probably busy to help correct anytime soon. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
23:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I was just wondering what opinions are about splitting I-587. The small section it's in currently is definitely neglected and should be much bigger for a route close to completion. Also, a large section has been designated as an
Interstate, which I would believe enough criteria for it to be official.
DiscoA340 (
talk)
16:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Probably should be now,
as of today, signage for I-587 now appear on the freeway; well, they removed US 264 and slapped I-587 while leaving the old east-west markers on it, though I am sure it was supposed to be north-south. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Looking at the draft @
Ncchild it looks good, the only thing I would recommend is adding a "Future" section which talks about the eventual designation of the route, west of I-95. but all in all, it's good.
DiscoA340 (
talk)
01:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Two quick things. For one, I wrote the article expecting US 264 to be moved onto its alternate route from Farmville to Greenville, as was proposed by NCDOT and approved by AASHTO. NCDOT does seem to be replacing the US 264 signs with I-587 ones (instead of putting them next to each other) which seems to indicate this. However, is this significant enough to consider US 264 as moved onto its new route?
Secondly, I think, but am not positive that I-587 is using its own mile markers, which likely means it will use its own exits. But I don't have confirmation of either. Should I leave it as is right now?
Ncchild (
talk)
03:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I expect NCDOT is currently in the process of rerouting US 264 between north of Saratoga to Greenville, we already have the paperwork confirming this, and as part of I-587 designation, so we should go ahead and correct articles on this new alignment as well. The biggest trick now is breaking up US 264 Alt, which will be fragmented to two sections: Zebulon-Wilson and Greenville. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
13:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I do not think that is necessary, this should all be in the History section as I-587 replaces and continue to replace US 264 between Zebulon and Greenville. --
WashuOtaku (
talk)
14:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Sorry for double commenting but I found this tool on the
Connect NCDOT website which may be of use. I've noticed that in both
Beaufort and
Pitt Counties plan, it shows them wanting a freeway grade route to continue on US 264 until Washington, NC. It might not mean anything related to I-587 though.
DiscoA340 (
talk)
14:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The map can be done, I can work on it later today. As for any sort of upgrades to Washington, I think that would be better suited for a future section of this article (US 264). I can begin working on cleaning up and upgrading 264 but it'll be after I finish
NC 97.
Ncchild (
talk)
14:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.