U.S. Route 163 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: Default sort key "U.S. Route 163" overrides earlier default sort key "U.S. Route A163".
An anon editor (not me) added a Navajo Nation Highway as a junction list, only to see it get reverted, re-added and re-re-verted in a 12 hour period. For the record the anon editor is right. See the 2nd photo on this page: http://www.geocities.com/usend6069/End163/end163.htm
I don't get it, this highway is on the Navajo Nation, a semi-autonomous nation within the states of AZ, UT, and NM. The Navajo Nation does have their own department of transportation and does both jointly maintain US and state highways that pass through their lands as well as have their own system of highways. Why is it inappropriate to mention them in a Wikipedia article? If nobody can explain this to me I think it should be re-added Davemeistermoab ( talk) 17:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I am planning on getting this article ready to be submitted for a GA nomination, but I need some help from the Utah side of the border. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Holderca1 talk 15:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Good work, I agree with most of the changes you made, I disagree with 3.
I just noticed that the UDOT links are broken. -- Holderca1 talk 14:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Also, would mentioning any movies, etc... depicting the highway itself be worth mentioning or would that be getting too trivial? -- Holderca1 talk 14:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay, reworked the history part of the lead. -- Holderca1 talk 16:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind about the links, their website must of just had a temporary problem, they seem to be working fine now. I have nominated the article for GA as I don't see any glaring problems with the article. -- Holderca1 talk 18:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
The article is beautiful Holderca1, I really feel that this meets all criteria. Good job man. Mitch 32 contribs 14:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Polaron recently changes this article to reflect some supposed truncation by UDOT, but all the references still show the old length. Maybe this is correct, but it needs references. Will give a couple days to dig up the info before reverting. DeFaultRyan ( talk) 21:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Recently an anonymous editor added the following: Another proposal would have US 163 run along Arizona State Route 98, U.S. Route 89, U.S. Route 89A, Arizona State Route 389, State Route 59, and State Route 9 to I-15 north of St. George.
At a minimum this needs to be tweaked, as the rest of the paragraph is sourced via UDOT logs, and this proposal is not mentioned anywhere in the UDOT logs. So, as written this is misleading. However, the bigger question is, is this true? sources, anybody heard of this before? Dave ( talk) 21:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 163. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 163. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.transportation.org/sites/route/docs/US%20Routes%20Application.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Someone has removed Navajo Highway 42 from the junctions list (amazingly this was done several months ago and nobody apparently noticed) Checking the Navajo DOT's webpage, Highway 42 is still designated and mantained, see thsi 2012 map (the most recent they have available) [1] so I'll re-add it. Dave ( talk) 16:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
U.S. Route 163 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: Default sort key "U.S. Route 163" overrides earlier default sort key "U.S. Route A163".
An anon editor (not me) added a Navajo Nation Highway as a junction list, only to see it get reverted, re-added and re-re-verted in a 12 hour period. For the record the anon editor is right. See the 2nd photo on this page: http://www.geocities.com/usend6069/End163/end163.htm
I don't get it, this highway is on the Navajo Nation, a semi-autonomous nation within the states of AZ, UT, and NM. The Navajo Nation does have their own department of transportation and does both jointly maintain US and state highways that pass through their lands as well as have their own system of highways. Why is it inappropriate to mention them in a Wikipedia article? If nobody can explain this to me I think it should be re-added Davemeistermoab ( talk) 17:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I am planning on getting this article ready to be submitted for a GA nomination, but I need some help from the Utah side of the border. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Holderca1 talk 15:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Good work, I agree with most of the changes you made, I disagree with 3.
I just noticed that the UDOT links are broken. -- Holderca1 talk 14:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Also, would mentioning any movies, etc... depicting the highway itself be worth mentioning or would that be getting too trivial? -- Holderca1 talk 14:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay, reworked the history part of the lead. -- Holderca1 talk 16:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind about the links, their website must of just had a temporary problem, they seem to be working fine now. I have nominated the article for GA as I don't see any glaring problems with the article. -- Holderca1 talk 18:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
The article is beautiful Holderca1, I really feel that this meets all criteria. Good job man. Mitch 32 contribs 14:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Polaron recently changes this article to reflect some supposed truncation by UDOT, but all the references still show the old length. Maybe this is correct, but it needs references. Will give a couple days to dig up the info before reverting. DeFaultRyan ( talk) 21:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Recently an anonymous editor added the following: Another proposal would have US 163 run along Arizona State Route 98, U.S. Route 89, U.S. Route 89A, Arizona State Route 389, State Route 59, and State Route 9 to I-15 north of St. George.
At a minimum this needs to be tweaked, as the rest of the paragraph is sourced via UDOT logs, and this proposal is not mentioned anywhere in the UDOT logs. So, as written this is misleading. However, the bigger question is, is this true? sources, anybody heard of this before? Dave ( talk) 21:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 163. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 163. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.transportation.org/sites/route/docs/US%20Routes%20Application.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Someone has removed Navajo Highway 42 from the junctions list (amazingly this was done several months ago and nobody apparently noticed) Checking the Navajo DOT's webpage, Highway 42 is still designated and mantained, see thsi 2012 map (the most recent they have available) [1] so I'll re-add it. Dave ( talk) 16:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)