From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What would this article be in English? " Boiling excrement"?

Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English):

The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources

In ictu oculi ( talk) 21:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Tzoah Rotachatboiling excrementRelisted. Vegaswikian ( talk) 08:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC) per WP:EN and Google Scholar/ WP:RS. Saving the most pungent of this series of article-creations till last. In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, really?? I think you may have misheard that, since sewage treatment does not "boil" anything. In any case there is no reference to waste treatment under "boiling excrement" in Google Books, where almost all 293 references to the term "boiling excrement" refer to exactly what this article has in Hebrew. In ictu oculi ( talk) 05:02, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Perhaps, but I do remember reading of a toilet system that boiled the waste and then incinerated what was left. 70.24.248.23 ( talk) 12:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply
IZAK, this is, I'm sorry, not your best. As Forrest Gump never said " WP:WAR is as WP:WAR does". Let he who wants to war war. Personally I'm getting less and less impressed or interested in seeing cut and paste comments thrown at different RMs without bothering to even click Google Books searches that are already done. Afraid of looking at the results? This is not the way WP guidelines should be weighed and considered, and applied by editors. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:04, 8 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I'm all with IZAK on this one. I've seen many an article where In ictu oculi starts a name page change to what he feels is WP:EN (see Talk:Mnachem Risikoff for starters) only to be out-voted.. (talk about us "getting less and less impressed or interested"..-- Marecheth Ho'eElohuth ( talk) 19:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What would this article be in English? " Boiling excrement"?

Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English):

The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources

In ictu oculi ( talk) 21:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Tzoah Rotachatboiling excrementRelisted. Vegaswikian ( talk) 08:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC) per WP:EN and Google Scholar/ WP:RS. Saving the most pungent of this series of article-creations till last. In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, really?? I think you may have misheard that, since sewage treatment does not "boil" anything. In any case there is no reference to waste treatment under "boiling excrement" in Google Books, where almost all 293 references to the term "boiling excrement" refer to exactly what this article has in Hebrew. In ictu oculi ( talk) 05:02, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Perhaps, but I do remember reading of a toilet system that boiled the waste and then incinerated what was left. 70.24.248.23 ( talk) 12:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply
IZAK, this is, I'm sorry, not your best. As Forrest Gump never said " WP:WAR is as WP:WAR does". Let he who wants to war war. Personally I'm getting less and less impressed or interested in seeing cut and paste comments thrown at different RMs without bothering to even click Google Books searches that are already done. Afraid of looking at the results? This is not the way WP guidelines should be weighed and considered, and applied by editors. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:04, 8 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I'm all with IZAK on this one. I've seen many an article where In ictu oculi starts a name page change to what he feels is WP:EN (see Talk:Mnachem Risikoff for starters) only to be out-voted.. (talk about us "getting less and less impressed or interested"..-- Marecheth Ho'eElohuth ( talk) 19:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook