This article was nominated for deletion on 6 November 2006. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alabama Start‑class This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. College football This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article went through an AFD for non-notability back in November 2006 - the nominator withdrew it, so there was no consensus reached. The nominator stated that he would renominate if it was determined that Prothro would not be returning to football. that editor is now banned, so presumably won't be making that nomination, but it is time to think about it. If we assume that his playing career is over, are his acheivements to date sufficient to make him notable? -- Pawl 17:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I personally think it is enough to warrant keeping the article. He won an ESPY Award and was a starting skill position player for a Top25 team. So it seems he certainly meets the criteria having "received significant recognized awards or honors" and was an athlete "at the highest level in mainly amateur sports...including college sports in the United States" (from WP:BIO). There are many, many former college players (who did not play pro or who washed out of the league) that still have articles so not sure why this one keeps being brought up for deletion (btw the nominator withdrew because the consensus was keep - I dont remember anyone else agreeing to delete). Honestly, his injury itself is possibly notable enough for inclusion as it was a national news story - even 2 years later when saban booted him off athletic scholarship. Just my opinion. -- otduff ^t/ _c 20:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Personaly, I agree with you - and it seemed clear to me that the editor in question had an axe to grind for some reason - but I felt that I should bring it up. Glad to see no one disagreed. (I think that there were one or two other votes for delete at the time.) -- Pawl 03:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Please see the Wikipedia note on links to copyrighted works before adding this link back. Be aware that this may be deemed an illegal act, and it will be reverted again. Yes, we all are in awe of that catch - but you do not own the rights to the video, and neither does YouTube. Thanks! -- Pawl 03:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Thecatch.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Thecatch2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Thecatch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tyrone Prothro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080701145407/http://secsports.com:80/index.php?s= to http://www.secsports.com/index.php?s=&url_channel_id=2&url_article_id=6547&change_well_id=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC) reply